2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of alveolar nerve function after surgical lengthening of the mandible by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most studies, these fractures are treated with miniplates, monocortical screws, and intermaxillary fixation 34 . We can compare our results with those from recent investigations of sensitivity alterations after mandibular osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis 2 . The incidence of IAN disturbances ranged from 10% to 94%, depending on the testing method used 44 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In most studies, these fractures are treated with miniplates, monocortical screws, and intermaxillary fixation 34 . We can compare our results with those from recent investigations of sensitivity alterations after mandibular osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis 2 . The incidence of IAN disturbances ranged from 10% to 94%, depending on the testing method used 44 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…10,12,13,16 In terms of skeletal stability, there is no difference between a BSSO and a DO for moderate advancements up to 10 mm. 9,11,14,15 From this study it can be concluded that for advancements of the mandible of up to 10 mm in non-syndromal class II patients, a BSSO is more cost-effective than DO, and these patients experience less discomfort and pain than patients subjected to a DO procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although early reports on DO were promising, [6][7][8] comparative studies between DO and BSSO revealed no differences. [9][10][11][12][13][14] A recent prospective study comparing BSSO and DO for advancement of the non-syndromal hypoplastic mandible showed equal results with regard to the primary outcome parameters of skeletal stabilty 15 and neurosensory disorders. 16 In this respect BSSO and DO are comparable procedures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Hence, these parameters cannot be the basis of decision making while choosing DO over orthognathic surgery. The claimed advantage of DO is better soft tissue response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%