2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of lateral wall scar on reverse remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Medicare Registry of 14 946 patients undergoing CRT, there were 2952 (20%) patients with NIVCD. 10 These patients had intermediate outcomes compared with patients with RBBB and LBBB. For example, the HR for mortality at 1 year compared with patients with LBBB was 1.18 (1.05-1.32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Medicare Registry of 14 946 patients undergoing CRT, there were 2952 (20%) patients with NIVCD. 10 These patients had intermediate outcomes compared with patients with RBBB and LBBB. For example, the HR for mortality at 1 year compared with patients with LBBB was 1.18 (1.05-1.32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5,6 Potential explanations for this include insufficient left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony 7,8 and excess LV scaring. 9,10 Previous studies have shown that a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) pattern is a strong predictor of outcomes compared with the presence of other ECG morphologies. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Several other key clinical questions remain, and more data are required to inform these issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 Also, scar at the site of pacing and total scar burden decrease the response to CRT because dead tissue is less likely to contract, even with pacing. [25][26][27][28][29] In PROSPECT-ECG, nonis- Table 3). None of the ECG parameters that predicted an improvement in LVESV interacted with cardiomyopathy cause, suggesting the ECG parameters are applicable to both ( Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Our group and others have observed that the extent of regional or LV scaring also seems important in determining response to CRT. [13][14][15][16] Left bundle branch block (LBBB) leads to regions of both early and delayed contraction [17][18][19] which results in reduced work in early activated regions (i.e., the septum) and increased work in late-activated regions (i.e., the LV free wall). 18 Reduced septal work in patients with LBBB is associated with decreased glucose utilization as measured using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%