1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02663256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of knots on the flatwise bending stiffness of lumber members

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knots had an average KAR of 0.51 (0.5 median) and were significantly different to the clear samples for bending MOE (p < 0.001) and strength (p < 0.001) with averages of 22.5% (23.1% median) and 41.6% (39.4% median) less, respectively (Figure 9 and Table 2). This is similar to reductions for KAR of 0.5 on-flat bending seen in Samson and Blanchet [50] but less than that seen for on-edge bending [51,52] which is reasonable given others have found knots to have less impact in on-flat bending [50,53]. Figure 10 shows that there is a decreasing trend for MOE and strength with increasing KAR but KAR alone was not a strong indicator with low R 2 values.…”
Section: Effect Of Knotssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knots had an average KAR of 0.51 (0.5 median) and were significantly different to the clear samples for bending MOE (p < 0.001) and strength (p < 0.001) with averages of 22.5% (23.1% median) and 41.6% (39.4% median) less, respectively (Figure 9 and Table 2). This is similar to reductions for KAR of 0.5 on-flat bending seen in Samson and Blanchet [50] but less than that seen for on-edge bending [51,52] which is reasonable given others have found knots to have less impact in on-flat bending [50,53]. Figure 10 shows that there is a decreasing trend for MOE and strength with increasing KAR but KAR alone was not a strong indicator with low R 2 values.…”
Section: Effect Of Knotssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Figure 10 shows that there is a decreasing trend for MOE and strength with increasing KAR but KAR alone was not a strong indicator with low R 2 values. The rate of change in MOE and strength with increasing KAR is low at around 45% and 20% less, respectively, than others in the literature [50][51][52]. This can be expected given these other studies looked at higherlongitudinal-stiffness timber which has a greater difference between longitudinal and transverse properties.…”
Section: Effect Of Knotsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…the knot cluster with the highest tKAR-value) is assumed as the load-bearing capacity of the entire timber board. The interrelation between the stiffness properties and knot indicators are analysed in Samson and Blanchet (1992) and . In all studies described above, no knot-indicator could be found for an efficient prediction of the strength and stiffness properties of structural timber without considering additional indicators, such as the density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%