2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of jet velocity in co-flow water cavitation jet peening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the preliminary experiment results, as shown in Figure 3, an impact zone with good forming effects under different incident pressures appeared between two concentric circles whose radii were R 1 and R 2 , and whose center was aligned with the jet axis. Considering the region between the two concentric circles with radii R 1 = 12.3 mm (i.e., the maximum value of R 1 ) and R 2 = 19.3 mm (i.e., the minimum value of R 2 ) was always a stable impact zone in the range of incident pressure investigated (i.e., 8,12,16, and 20 MPa), a compromise value of 14 mm was set for the axial spacing S L (i.e., the distance between the centerline of the micromold cavity and the jet axis) to ensure that the cavitation impact forming zone was located stably in the central region of the micromold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the preliminary experiment results, as shown in Figure 3, an impact zone with good forming effects under different incident pressures appeared between two concentric circles whose radii were R 1 and R 2 , and whose center was aligned with the jet axis. Considering the region between the two concentric circles with radii R 1 = 12.3 mm (i.e., the maximum value of R 1 ) and R 2 = 19.3 mm (i.e., the minimum value of R 2 ) was always a stable impact zone in the range of incident pressure investigated (i.e., 8,12,16, and 20 MPa), a compromise value of 14 mm was set for the axial spacing S L (i.e., the distance between the centerline of the micromold cavity and the jet axis) to ensure that the cavitation impact forming zone was located stably in the central region of the micromold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The effects of the nozzle structure, spray pressure, target distance, and other process parameters on the microstructure changes of the materials were revealed. Marcon et al [12] used the high-energy shock wave of water-jet cavitation to bend the duralumin alloy sheet of an aircraft wing and discovered that the cavitation nozzle exhibited a large deformation curvature. Tsuda et al [13] combined quenching with cavitation shot peening to strengthen a carbon-steel spiral gear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soyama realized "a cavitating jet in air" by injecting a high-speed water jet into a low speed water jet, which was injected into air without a water-filled chamber, and demonstrated the introduction of compressive residual stress into a metallic surface and the resulting improvement of fatigue strength of stainless steel [27,28] and nitrocarburized steel [29]. The cavitating jet in air research has been followed by Marcon et al [30,31]. The differences produced by the introduced distribution of compressive residuals stress between a cavitating jet in water and a cavitating jet in air is summarized in Section 4.1.…”
Section: History Of Cavitation Peeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation and collapse of the bubbles induces the cavitation sonic vibration effect. In the process of bubble collapse, a local high temperature of about 5000 K and a pressure of 500 atmospheres is generated, accompanied by a strong shock wave and high-speed micro-jets [16]. Thus, strong vibrations are produced by the cavitation sonic effect.…”
Section: Cavitation Sonic Vibration Effect Of the Sowjmentioning
confidence: 99%