2003
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2003)129:5(358)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Jet Air Content on Plunge Pool Scour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the aerated jet velocity is 319 the same as the pure water jet velocity, the maximum pressure of aerated jet is smaller 320 than that of nonaerated jet due to the decrease of the density of aerated jet. This 321 conclusion is consistent with that of Canepa and Hager (2003). 322…”
Section: Maximum Pressure At Tank Bottom 299supporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, when the aerated jet velocity is 319 the same as the pure water jet velocity, the maximum pressure of aerated jet is smaller 320 than that of nonaerated jet due to the decrease of the density of aerated jet. This 321 conclusion is consistent with that of Canepa and Hager (2003). 322…”
Section: Maximum Pressure At Tank Bottom 299supporting
confidence: 82%
“…over 10 m) with vertical or over-hanging bed form geometries may have regions not subject to direct flow-induced shear for a large range of discharges. Break up and aeration of the flow jet, which was not investigated in this study, may also attenuate scour considerably as has been shown in laboratory flume investigations (Chanson, 1996;Bennett et al, 2000;Bennett and Casali, 2001;Canepa and Hager, 2003). In addition, differences in jet projection length suggest low-to moderate-dipping sloping jet regions (e.g.…”
Section: Geomorphology Of Natural Jets and Natural Jumpsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This leads to a spread of the jet decreasing its density due to air entrainment. The resulting larger jet-footprint on the plunge pool surface as well as the decreased density reduces the scour potential on a loose river bed (Canepa andHager 2003, Pagliara et al 2006). Such a loose bed is however rapidly washed out during operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%