2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ionic plasma nitriding process on the corrosion and micro-abrasive wear behavior of AISI 316L austenitic and AISI 470 super-ferritic stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The various physical techniques of surface treatment of austenitic steel were compared in Table 1 , taking into account the maximal hardness and averaging depths of the produced surface layers. The maximal hardness of laser-alloyed layers with boron (595–796 HV0.1) or with boron and selected metallic elements (675–911 HV0.1) ([ 60 ] and this work) was relatively low in comparison with the surface layers, produced on the austenitic stainless steel using other physical techniques such as LTPGN processes (572–2175 HV or 720–1100 HK at different loads) [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 23 ], LTPGNC process (962 HV) [ 7 ], HTPGN processes (1060–1340 HV) [ 3 , 5 , 14 , 15 ], LTPGC process (11–11.8 GPa) [ 26 ] or PPB process (28.093 GPa) [ 31 ]. Many hybrid treatments with the use of plasma processes also resulted in higher hardness of the fabricated surface layers, e.g., shot peening (SP) followed by LTPGN or sequential LTPGC and LTPGN (1615–1662 HV or 7.5–11.5 GPa, respectively) [ 17 , 19 ], cold spraying (CS) of 316L steel followed by LTPGN, LTPGC and LTPGNC processes or their various combinations (800–1350 HV) [ 21 ], LTPGN process followed by a multi-arc ion plating (MAIP) (2280 HV) [ 23 ] as well as TiN coatings produced by PVD technique (18.7–26 GPa) [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The various physical techniques of surface treatment of austenitic steel were compared in Table 1 , taking into account the maximal hardness and averaging depths of the produced surface layers. The maximal hardness of laser-alloyed layers with boron (595–796 HV0.1) or with boron and selected metallic elements (675–911 HV0.1) ([ 60 ] and this work) was relatively low in comparison with the surface layers, produced on the austenitic stainless steel using other physical techniques such as LTPGN processes (572–2175 HV or 720–1100 HK at different loads) [ 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 23 ], LTPGNC process (962 HV) [ 7 ], HTPGN processes (1060–1340 HV) [ 3 , 5 , 14 , 15 ], LTPGC process (11–11.8 GPa) [ 26 ] or PPB process (28.093 GPa) [ 31 ]. Many hybrid treatments with the use of plasma processes also resulted in higher hardness of the fabricated surface layers, e.g., shot peening (SP) followed by LTPGN or sequential LTPGC and LTPGN (1615–1662 HV or 7.5–11.5 GPa, respectively) [ 17 , 19 ], cold spraying (CS) of 316L steel followed by LTPGN, LTPGC and LTPGNC processes or their various combinations (800–1350 HV) [ 21 ], LTPGN process followed by a multi-arc ion plating (MAIP) (2280 HV) [ 23 ] as well as TiN coatings produced by PVD technique (18.7–26 GPa) [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The different techniques and methods of wear evaluation were reported in literature data regarding the wear behavior of the surface layers produced in austenitic steels. The samples, subjected to LTPGN process, were tested using the “block-on-ring” technique with AISI 52100 steel as a ring-shaped counter-sample [ 2 , 3 ], “ball-on-disc” method using AISI 52100 steel [ 5 , 9 ] or Al 2 O 3 [ 7 ] in the shape of ball as a counter-sample or “pin-on-disc” technique using AISI 1045 steel as a counter-sample in the shape of pin [ 8 ]. Unfortunately, in the case of very interesting technique of LTPGN using an active screen [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] the wear resistance of the layers was not studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, there is a change in the phase-structural state of the base [11,12]. In this direction, the method of ionic nitriding has received the greatest development [13,14]. The use of the second type of surface modification provides a qualitatively new phase composition and surface properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%