This article refers to 'Iron deficiency in heart failure: Screening, prevalence, incidence and outcome data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry and the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements collaborative project' by F. Lindberg et al., published in this issue on pages 1270-1280.Iron deficiency (ID) is a common condition in patients with heart failure (HF) and has been associated with poor prognosis and impaired quality of life, regardless of the presence of anaemia. 1,2 Intravenous (IV) iron replacement therapy with ferric carboxymaltose has shown improvements in symptoms, functional capacity and overall health status in patients with HF and reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction. 2-4 However, the implementation of guideline recommendations for testing and treating ID in HF patients remains challenging in real-world clinical practice.In this issue of the Journal, the study by Lindberg et al. 5 utilized data from the Swedish HF registry and the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements project to assess the testing and prevalence of ID in HF patients. The results revealed that testing for ID, defined by ferritin and transferrin saturation measurements, increased over time but remained markedly suboptimal. In 2018, only 24% of HF patients underwent ID testing, with higher rates observed in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (31%) compared to patients with preserved ejection fraction (15%). 5 These findings highlight the insufficient adherence to guideline recommendations for systematic screening of ID in HF patients, as outlined in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. 2 Probably even more surprisingly, despite the high prevalence of ID, the utilization of IV iron treatment was remarkably low, with only a small fraction of patients receiving iron supplementation consistent with guideline recommendations. Actually, the utilization of IV iron was marginally higher in patients with ID (13%) than in patients without (5%) (when considering a period later than 2017). However, as ID was screened in a minority of patients (about 30% of HFrEF), it is probable that 5-10% of patients with ID (either diagnosed or undiagnosed) were actually treated with IV iron. Of note, according to 2021 ESC guidelines, 2 IV iron supplementation should be considered in symptomatic patients with left ventricularThe opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Journal of Heart Failure or of the European Society of Cardiology.