2014
DOI: 10.3920/bm2013.0075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intestinal colonisation by two Lactobacillus strains on the immune response of gnotobiotic mice

Abstract: The effect of intestinal colonisation on the immune system was investigated in germ-free mice monoassociated with Lactobacillus strains isolated from calf faeces. Single doses of Lactobacillus acidophilus L36 or Lactobacillus salivarius L38 were administered to germ-free mice by intragastric gavage. Ten days later, the mice were euthanised. Gene expression levels of interleukin 5 (IL-5), IL-6, IL-10, IL-12b, IL-17a, gamma interferon (IFN-γ), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), and tumour necrosis facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…L. salivarius (L38) and L acidophilus (L36) strains were previously isolated from bovine stool samples (unpublished data) and in in vivo experiments with germ-free mice they successfully colonized and changed the expression of cytokines in the gastrointestinal tract of gnotobiotic animals [ 28 ]. Herein, L38 and L36 bacteria were supplied as live suspensions to mice challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to evaluate, on the 9th day post-infection, their effects on animal weight, spleen and liver size indexes, and small intestine architecture and histological aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…L. salivarius (L38) and L acidophilus (L36) strains were previously isolated from bovine stool samples (unpublished data) and in in vivo experiments with germ-free mice they successfully colonized and changed the expression of cytokines in the gastrointestinal tract of gnotobiotic animals [ 28 ]. Herein, L38 and L36 bacteria were supplied as live suspensions to mice challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to evaluate, on the 9th day post-infection, their effects on animal weight, spleen and liver size indexes, and small intestine architecture and histological aspects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene-specific primers for the cytokines and reference genes ACTB and GAPDH were used according to [ 33 ]. The reactions were performed according to the optimized parameters described in [ 28 ] using an ABI Prism 7900 HT sequence detection system and the analysis was conducted using Sequence Detection software Version 2.4 (Applied Biosystems). The expression levels in the saline control group and Salmonella control group were used as the calibration data in challenged and no-challenged groups, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Biologic validation of these methods on large human cohorts will be necessary to demonstrate the strength and clinical utility of these types of predictors and therapeutic management of disease. 56 Comparison of germ-free vs SPF mice Basal behavior for germ-free mice vs SPF mice was interpreted as anxiolytic; increased BDNF mRNA in hippocampus of germ-free animals Mouse 57 Campylobacter jejuni Increased anxiety-like behavior and increased markers of activation within the limbic structures in the brain Mouse 41 Lactobacillus rhamnosus Induced region-dependent alterations in GABA mRNA in the brain and reduced stress-induced corticosterone level and anxiety-and depression-related behavior that was not seen in vagotimized mice Mouse 58 Lactobacillus acidophilus L36 or Lactobacillus salivarius L38 L36 increased the expression of Th2 cytokines (IL-5, IL-6 and TGF-b1) and Th17 (IL-17a, TNF-a and IL-6) inflammatory response Conventional…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of MATS experiments facilitates a qualitative assessment of the polarity or non-polarity of the bacterial surface, which is important because it indicates the potential for probiotic adhesion to apolar surfaces in the intestinal and vaginal epithelia. However, this test is only a primary indicator of the adherence of microorganisms [81; 82]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%