2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of internal woven roller shade and glazing on the energy and daylighting performances of an office building in the cold climate of Shillong

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper proposed an analysis with scale model. This technique is called 'reference office' as a lighting assessment methodology (13,(32)(33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposed an analysis with scale model. This technique is called 'reference office' as a lighting assessment methodology (13,(32)(33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khoroshiltseva et al [17] proposed a multiobjective evolutionary design approach for the optimization (m-EDO) of shading devices which are part of the renovation kits of an existing residential building in Madrid. Singh et al [18] investigated the effect of extended values of shade transmittance on energy and visual performances of the office building. The study has been conducted for Shillong, which can be considered as representative of cold climates in India.…”
Section: A Review Of Previous Studies On the Application Of Horizontamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The window design variables for this study were the window size, position and form, as well as the window type. The window design variables were selected as they concurrently affect visual comfort, thermal comfort, energy consumption and LCC (Acosta, Munoz, Campano, & Navarro, 2015;Atzeri, Cappelletti, Gasparella, & Tzempelikos, 2013;Kämpf, Wetter, & Robinson, 2010;Lee & Tavil, 2007;Mainini, Bonato, Poli, & Speroni, 2015;Singh, Lazarus, & Kishore, 2015;Suga, Kato, & Hiyama, 2010;Wright, 2009;Zemella et al, 2011). Table 3.…”
Section: Optimisation Phasementioning
confidence: 99%