2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of internal versus external focus of attention on implicit motor learning in children with developmental coordination disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the first study that examines the effect of feedback with either an internal or external focus of attention on a novel, complex motor task in a group of children with pDCD. A priori, we hypothesized a beneficial effect of an external focus, but our results are in line with the study of Jarus et al (2015) who also failed to show any differences in motor learning with an internal or external focus of attention in children with DCD using a computerized tracking task. These findings suggest that practice itself, regardless of the attentional focus, contributes to improvements in performance in children with pDCD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is the first study that examines the effect of feedback with either an internal or external focus of attention on a novel, complex motor task in a group of children with pDCD. A priori, we hypothesized a beneficial effect of an external focus, but our results are in line with the study of Jarus et al (2015) who also failed to show any differences in motor learning with an internal or external focus of attention in children with DCD using a computerized tracking task. These findings suggest that practice itself, regardless of the attentional focus, contributes to improvements in performance in children with pDCD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although beneficial effects of external focus instruction and feedback have been found for children's motor performance and learning (e.g., Palmer et al 2017), this has not been consistently observed (e.g., Jarus et al, 2015;Perreault & French, 2016). These findings are in line with the constrained action hypothesis (Wulf, McNevin, & Shea, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Three of these focused on procedural learning, one on learning with an internal/external focus of attention, and one on learning balance control . The rate of procedural learning did not differ between groups using either a serial reaction time task, a perceptual‐motor procedural learning task, or a sequential finger tapping task …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consolidation of learning was also demonstrated by Biotteau et al under dual‐task conditions supporting ‘true’ learning effects (not mere practice effects). On a more complex continuous tracking task (using a joystick), implicit learning was compromised in DCD . Whether these children are able to ‘catch up’ after more extensive practice is an issue for future work, as is the effect of training procedures that better encourage children to adopt an external focus of attention …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation