We have read with interest the recent letter of SanchisGomar et al. (2010), and we basically agree with the authors who concluded that normobaric hypoxia can significantly modify several hematological parameters tested by anti-doping authorities so that anti-doping organizations should take into account the possibility of including normobaric hypoxia among the doping practices at least as a masking method in sports. Nevertheless, we raise several doubts about the fact that two out of three criteria presented by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) for substances and methods to be considered for placement on the prohibited list (i.e., normobaric hypoxia does not exert significant ergogenic effects, and real or simulated altitude is quite safe and unlikely to injure an athlete) were considered by the authors not applicable to normobaric hypoxia.As regards the biological mechanisms supporting the potential ergogenic effect of normobaric hypoxia, these have been recently reviewed by Lemaître et al. (2010) and include (a) optimization of the stimuli needed to improve oxygen delivery while avoiding the detraining effects associated with chronic hypoxia, (b) the splenic contraction effect which increases both hematocrit and hemoglobin between 2 and 5% independently of hemoconcentration and reduces arterial oxygen desaturation, (c) the reduction of blood acidosis (which is enormously advantageous for exercise performance), oxidative stress, and basal metabolic rate, and (d) and the increase in lung volume. It was also recently observed that although 8 weeks of respiratory muscle training did not increase maximum oxygen uptake ð _