1965
DOI: 10.1093/jn/86.3.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Intermittent Food Restriction on Growth, Food Utilization and Body Composition of the Rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight gain was even more severely impaired than was food intake. This is in direct contrast to Heggeness's findings [7], and an explanation is not apparent. It may be that protein catabolism during periods of fasting was sufficient to impair synthesis of key enzymes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Weight gain was even more severely impaired than was food intake. This is in direct contrast to Heggeness's findings [7], and an explanation is not apparent. It may be that protein catabolism during periods of fasting was sufficient to impair synthesis of key enzymes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…The finding of increased carcass lipid was similar to that noted by H eggeness [7] and implies an increased amount of adipose tissue per gram of rat and hence a relative obesity even in the presence of decreased body weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experiments in which growth efficiency of the diet was compared in "trained" rats and those allowed to eat ad libitum have yielded data suggesting that the "trained" rat was more economical in his use of cal ories and had a decreased energy expendi ture (26,27). However, the results were based on a collation of animals differing not only in the periodicity of food con sumption but also in the quantity of food eaten daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%