2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of inter-basin water transfer on water quality in an urban lake: A combined water quality index algorithm and biophysical modelling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the complexity of these models and the frequent data limitations (e.g., lack of continuous in situ data), it is rare to find studies performing both processes simultaneously, as recognized by Whitehead et al [65] and Tomic et al [66]. By these reasons, a large number of modeling studies perform only one of these processes (e.g., [67][68][69][70]), or alternatively perform both processes for a very limited period or even solely based on seasonal data ( [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]). For the present study, and despite the common data limitations, both processes were performed for the hydrodynamic and water quality module in the Delft3D model implementation, following the procedures described below, and data sets presented in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of these models and the frequent data limitations (e.g., lack of continuous in situ data), it is rare to find studies performing both processes simultaneously, as recognized by Whitehead et al [65] and Tomic et al [66]. By these reasons, a large number of modeling studies perform only one of these processes (e.g., [67][68][69][70]), or alternatively perform both processes for a very limited period or even solely based on seasonal data ( [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78]). For the present study, and despite the common data limitations, both processes were performed for the hydrodynamic and water quality module in the Delft3D model implementation, following the procedures described below, and data sets presented in Section 2.2.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second stage is water quality prediction using the pre-processed data. Traditional water quality prediction methods mainly include: the Grey Markov chain model method [17,18], the fuzzy-set theory-based Markov model [19], the regression prediction method [20,21,22,23], the time series method [24,25], and the water quality model prediction method [26,27]. The water quality model prediction method has poor self-adaptability, and the other traditional prediction methods also have many shortcomings, such as low prediction accuracy, poor stability, and single factor prediction without considering dynamics characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thực tế diễn biến chất lượng nước phụ thuộc rất nhiều vào các yếu tố khí hậu, điều kiện tự nhiên và điều kiện sử dụng đất, lượng phân bón nông nghiệp, thủy sản, nước thải từ các khu công nghiệp, nước thải sinh hoạt,…Do đó, việc ứng dụng mô hình toán để mô phỏng, tính toán, dự báo lan truyền chất ô nhiễm là phương pháp hữu hiệu và hiệu quả [6][7][8]. Trên thế giới đã có rất nhiều các nghiên cứu về vấn đề dự báo dòng chảy, chất lượng nước ở các lưu vực sông, hồ theo hướng sử dụng công cụ mô hình hóa kết hợp với việc phân tích ảnh viễn thám GIS [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Giới Thiệuunclassified