2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Incorporating Genetic Testing Results into Nutrition Counseling and Care on Dietary Intake: An Evidence Analysis Center Systematic Review—Part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have suggested that it is unclear whether personalization based on phenotype or genotype has additional value as compared to only using dietary intake for personalization [ 93 , 94 ]. A recent systematic review on the effect of incorporating genetic testing results into nutrition counseling on dietary intake concludes that disclosure of genetic information in carriers of high-risk gene variants may produce benefits, but results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies and large heterogeneity [ 95 ]. In the present study, phenotype and genotype, and not dietary intake data, were used to create PDTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have suggested that it is unclear whether personalization based on phenotype or genotype has additional value as compared to only using dietary intake for personalization [ 93 , 94 ]. A recent systematic review on the effect of incorporating genetic testing results into nutrition counseling on dietary intake concludes that disclosure of genetic information in carriers of high-risk gene variants may produce benefits, but results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies and large heterogeneity [ 95 ]. In the present study, phenotype and genotype, and not dietary intake data, were used to create PDTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional guidelines based on genetic testing are still lacking, especially in IBD. One of the reasons for this is a lack of high-quality evidence on the effect of nutrition counseling based on genetics [ 10 ]. The high-throughput analysis of the human genome, based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology and genotyping microarrays, is becoming increasingly more available to researchers interested in nutritional genomics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consensus report by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics concluded that, at present, ‘there is insufficient evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the effectiveness of incorporating nutrigenetic testing into nutrition counseling or care [6]’ . The conclusion was based on two systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials on personalized nutrition that were published concurrently with the consensus report [7,8]. As illustrated by a letter to the Editor in response to the publication of the consensus report that highlighted methodological flaws of the systematic reviews [9], the Academy's conclusion was controversial and the debate on whether genetic testing for personalized nutrition is ready for prime time continues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%