2021
DOI: 10.1097/mco.0000000000000763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances and current controversies in genetic testing for personalized nutrition

Abstract: Purpose of review Considerable interest in personalized nutrition exists among the general public, policymakers, healthcare organizations and the private sector, but there is also skepticism of its utility. The present review aims to provide a summary of current controversies in the field of nutrigenomics, and to highlight recent research on the potential impact of implementing genetic testing for personalized nutrition in practice. Recent findings Nume… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in agreement with these previous findings and add to the evidence that CVD risk factors may be modifiable in young adults with high risk 9p21 genotypes. It is also important to note that these findings could explain previous inconsistencies linking one-size-fits-all dietary interventions to CVD outcomes (Jenkins et al, 2017) and might warrant a more personalized approach to dietary interventions to prevent CVD (Garcia-Bailo and El-Sohemy, 2021). We also acknowledge that replication of these analyses in other cohorts would add to the body of evidence.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Our findings are in agreement with these previous findings and add to the evidence that CVD risk factors may be modifiable in young adults with high risk 9p21 genotypes. It is also important to note that these findings could explain previous inconsistencies linking one-size-fits-all dietary interventions to CVD outcomes (Jenkins et al, 2017) and might warrant a more personalized approach to dietary interventions to prevent CVD (Garcia-Bailo and El-Sohemy, 2021). We also acknowledge that replication of these analyses in other cohorts would add to the body of evidence.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 68%
“…Therefore, an ideal prediction tool for precision nutrition will take these interactions into account. Finally, while genotyping can be an effective tool on its own, its main limitation comes from the fact that the genetic code alone does not provide information on gene expression, itself influenced by nutrients [34,35]. Consequently, complementing genetic testing with other methods would be beneficial for the implementation of precision nutrition in CVD prevention.…”
Section: Potential and Limitations Of Genotyping For Precision Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent update on personalised nutrition [31] noted several points around the use of genetic information for optimising nutritional advice. These included the need to select appropriate genetic variants, the greater affordability and accessibility of genetic tests (as opposed to more complex omics analyses) for implementing in practice, and the fact that evidence from randomised trials shows that DNA-based personalised advice is more effective at modifying behaviour than more general advice, or even personalised advice without a genetic component.…”
Section: Uptake Of Nutrigenetics In the General Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%