2013
DOI: 10.1117/12.2020662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of imposed boundary conditions on the accuracy of transport of intensity equation based solvers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively large magnitude of the latter may be partly due to the sensitivity of TIE to noise and to the immediate environment of the particular cell, with neighboring cells affecting the background in their vicinity. It is possible that reproducibility can be improved using more advanced algorithms for solving TIE, which is known to be sensitive to noise, experimental conditions and method of solution . However, it seems that reproducibility of our measurements was comparable to what is achieved by many other quantitative phase techniques .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The relatively large magnitude of the latter may be partly due to the sensitivity of TIE to noise and to the immediate environment of the particular cell, with neighboring cells affecting the background in their vicinity. It is possible that reproducibility can be improved using more advanced algorithms for solving TIE, which is known to be sensitive to noise, experimental conditions and method of solution . However, it seems that reproducibility of our measurements was comparable to what is achieved by many other quantitative phase techniques .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…During the time-lapse, many cells migrated in and out of the FOV, resulting in well-known artifacts associated with the artificial periodic boundary conditions imposed by the FFTbased processing [97,98]. Although these artifacts remain an issue, for this study we observed their greatest effect to be near the image boundaries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Since the phase function is exactly the quantity to be recovered, its value (for Dirichlet boundary condition) or normal derivative (for Neumann boundary condition) at the boundary cannot be known in advance before taking any measurements. To bypass the difficulty, many researchers have tried to solve TIE directly without explicitly imposing the boundary conditions [ 128 , 133 , 134 , 147 ]. Coincidentally, all the efforts aim to find some ways to nullify the overall energy transfer across the region boundary, making boundary conditions unnecessary …”
Section: Wavefront-based Light Field Imaging From Depth Measuremenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this configuration is rather restrictive and does not reflect general experimental conditions. When the actual experimental condition violates those imposed assumptions, e.g., in wavefront sensing (non-fact phase at the boundary) or objects extending outside the image boundary, as shown in Figure 15 b, severe boundary artifacts will appear, and they seriously affect the accuracy of the phase reconstruction [ 133 , 134 , 147 ].…”
Section: Wavefront-based Light Field Imaging From Depth Measuremenmentioning
confidence: 99%