2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00983.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: a 10‐year prospective cohort study of the ITI® Dental Implant System

Abstract: A significantly higher survival rate as well as a significantly lower incidence of peri-implantitis was identified for hollow screw design ITI Dental Implants after 10 years of service when compared to hollow cylinder design ITI Dental Implants (95.4% vs. 85.7%; 10% vs. 29%). Depending on the setting of the threshold criteria for success, success rates are highly variable and hence, reporting of success rates with elaboration on the criteria set appears crucial for comparison of different studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
222
4
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
222
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Rezultati ovog istraživanja pokazali su veće gubitke marginalne kosti kod implantata postavljenih u prednja područja u odnosu na one u stražnjima, ali nije bilo statistički značajne razlike između maksilarnih i mandibularnih mjesta implantacije godinu dana nakon njihova funkcionalnog opterećenja. Several factors influence implant prognosis and can attribute to implant failure: length and diameter of the implant, implant location, implant designs, bone quality, implant surface and the general health of the patient, functional loading (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). In the present study, the patients with systemic diseases have been excluded and implant prognosis was based on the different implant diameters.…”
Section: Zaključakunclassified
“…Rezultati ovog istraživanja pokazali su veće gubitke marginalne kosti kod implantata postavljenih u prednja područja u odnosu na one u stražnjima, ali nije bilo statistički značajne razlike između maksilarnih i mandibularnih mjesta implantacije godinu dana nakon njihova funkcionalnog opterećenja. Several factors influence implant prognosis and can attribute to implant failure: length and diameter of the implant, implant location, implant designs, bone quality, implant surface and the general health of the patient, functional loading (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). In the present study, the patients with systemic diseases have been excluded and implant prognosis was based on the different implant diameters.…”
Section: Zaključakunclassified
“…Several factors influence implant prognosis and can attribute to implant failure: length and diameter of the implant, implant location, implant designs, bone quality, implant surface and the general health of the patient [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Implants failed if the width of the attached gingival is ≤ 2 mm. Other studies have shown that a thin or absent masticatory gingival was associated with bleeding on probing and a significantly greater mean loss of alveolar bone [22]. b) Silk sutures were less likely to support bacterial colonization than other suture materials which minimizes the chance of odontogenic infections.Use of polyglactin 910 was associated with a higher incidence of early loss of implants [22].…”
Section: Other Possible Reasons Of Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smoking can inhibit blood flow to the bone may lead to disrupted Osseointegration [22]. d) A non-infectious process resulting in bone resorption, for which the term "aseptic loosening" is used [17].…”
Section: C)mentioning
confidence: 99%