2007
DOI: 10.1093/japr/16.3.438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Immersion or Dry Air Chilling on Broiler Carcass Moisture Retention and Breast Fillet Functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
30
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated that elevated temperatures or slower chilling rates may accelerate postmortem glycolysis and ultimate meat texture and functional properties [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Huezo et al [38] demonstrated that chilling method (air or immersion) had no effect on breast fillet tenderness when fillets are deboned 24 h postchill. However, there is no information available comparing breast fillet functionality of early deboned broiler carcasses chilled by either immersion or air.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have indicated that elevated temperatures or slower chilling rates may accelerate postmortem glycolysis and ultimate meat texture and functional properties [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Huezo et al [38] demonstrated that chilling method (air or immersion) had no effect on breast fillet tenderness when fillets are deboned 24 h postchill. However, there is no information available comparing breast fillet functionality of early deboned broiler carcasses chilled by either immersion or air.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No que diz respeito aos dois sistemas (imersão em água e ar), embora as taxas de refrigeração em um sistema de imersão sejam geralmente muito mais rápidas do que as obtidas em um sistema de ar, o custo operacional é mais oneroso no sistema por imersão (JAMES et al, 2006), bem como os custos de água e esgoto (HUEZO et al, 2007). Desse modo, estudos devem ser conduzidos no Brasil nesse sentido para que as empresas comecem a acompanhar tendên-cias internacionais de instituições de referência, não apenas para o pré-resfriamento das carcaças, como também para miúdos e pés, em que atualmente a presença dos chillers por imersão em água se faz obrigatória.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Air pre-cooling offers a great potential of quality improvement (less cross-contamination and better taste), minimizes water consumption and reduces the management of wastewater, thus representing a reduction of cost at the end of the process [16]. Despite this, using air cooling might reduce the carcass weight between 0.8% and 2.5% [17]. Nonetheless, air cooling makes fraud more difficult through excessive carcass absorption of water that usually happens in the water immersion pre-cooling system.…”
Section: Carcass Chilling and Added Watermentioning
confidence: 99%