2013
DOI: 10.2323/jgam.59.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of IAA produced by Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 on cotton growth under salt stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…SE992 had the capacity to produce IAA, which might compensate for the loss of endogenous IAA in plants affected by soil salinity. Similar findings were presented by Liu et al (2013), who found that IAA-producing Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 promoted cotton seedling growth under salt stress by enhancing endogenous IAA content. The significant increase in chlorophyll content in cucumber plants treated with Enterobacter sp.…”
Section: D 3dsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…SE992 had the capacity to produce IAA, which might compensate for the loss of endogenous IAA in plants affected by soil salinity. Similar findings were presented by Liu et al (2013), who found that IAA-producing Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 promoted cotton seedling growth under salt stress by enhancing endogenous IAA content. The significant increase in chlorophyll content in cucumber plants treated with Enterobacter sp.…”
Section: D 3dsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…For A. brasilense , a direct role for IAA production in the root architecture was demonstrated in wheat. In our study, EJ01 produced 43 mg/ml of IAA in liquid broth media, which was comparable with the amount produced by Klebsiella oxytoca Rs-5 (42.14 mg/ml broth), a bacterial strain that increases salt stress tolerance in cotton (Liu et al, 2013). This could be interpreted that auxin produced by EJ01 might be responsible for growth promotion and salt tolerance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…On the other hand, a case for the involvement of ACC deamination as the main bacterial modulator of growth and tolerance to saline stress in plants is supported by examples involving AcdS mutants of Pseudomonas species (Cheng et al, 2012; Ali et al, 2014; Han et al, 2015) but, for the most part of the reports in literature, the actual extent of the contribution of this bacterial enzyme to salinity tolerance induction in the host is not explored in detail, and has been mostly inferred from the existence of a functional AcdS in active bacterial isolates (Onofre-Lemus et al, 2009; Ahmad et al, 2013; Chang et al, 2014; Singh et al, 2015). However, it is worth noting that, in several cases, high ACC deaminase activity levels in isolates do not correlate with a better performance in salinity tolerance induction (Zheng et al, 2008; Tank and Saraf, 2010; Tiwari et al, 2011; Liu et al, 2013; Mapelli et al, 2013; Ramadoss et al, 2013), or even growth promotion activity in general (Dey et al, 2004; Long et al, 2008; Bruto et al, 2014). Furthermore, it has been observed that, in order to be effective, ACC deamination within plant tissues must deal with feedback regulation of ethylene biosynthesis (Yang and Hoffman, 1984), that will stimulate ethylene production when ACC levels are low (Vacheron et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it has been found that colonization of plants by certain specific plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can lead to enhanced resistance to abiotic challenges, such as water deficit (Naveed et al, 2014), salinity (Sziderics et al, 2007), adaptation to transplantation (Nowak and Shulaev, 2003), and chilling (Ait Barka et al, 2006). Over the last few years, several studies have reported the ability of isolated microorganisms to induce plant tolerance to salinity once they have been inoculated to seeds or young plantlets (reviewed in Yang et al, 2009; Dodd and Pérez-Alfocea, 2012; Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015), including a variety of hosts, like wheat (Nadeem et al, 2013; Singh et al, 2015), maize (Hamdia et al, 2004; Nadeem et al, 2009), cotton (Liu et al, 2013; Egamberdieva et al, 2015), tomato (Mayak et al, 2004; Ali et al, 2014), lettuce (Barassi et al, 2006; Kohler et al, 2009), sunflower (Shilev et al, 2010; Tewari and Arora, 2014) and Arabidopsis (Zhang et al, 2008; Kim et al, 2014; Sukweenadhi et al, 2015). Among the PGPR that have been demonstrated to play a role in salt stress tolerance induction, a wide diversity of bacteria is included, encompassing several members of the γ-proteobacteria class, specially within the genus Pseudomonas (Ahmad et al, 2013; Nadeem et al, 2013; Chang et al, 2014; Han et al, 2015), α-proteobacteria belonging to the Azospirillum genus (del Amor and Cuadra-Crespo, 2011; Nia et al, 2012; Sahoo et al, 2014), and β-proteobacteria like Achromobacter (Mayak et al, 2004) or Paraburkholderia (Talbi et al, 2013; Pinedo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%