1997
DOI: 10.1021/jp970204a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hydrophobic Modification of a Nonionic Cellulose Derivative on the Interaction with Surfactants. Rheology

Abstract: The interactions between various surfactants (anionic, cationic, and nonionic) and a nonionic ethyl(hydroxyethyl)cellulose (EHEC) polymer or a hydrophobically modified analogue (HM-EHEC) have been examined. The study has been performed as a comparative investigation between the hydrophobically modified polymer and the unmodified parent polymer using rheology. The rheological results have been analyzed with the aid of a simple modified Maxwell model. Information about the low-frequency behavior was extracted fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
109
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(45 reference statements)
7
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it has been found that as the chain length of the surfactant increases, there is a widening of the viscosity maximum as a result of an increase in the number of binding sites (41). This phenomenon can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Cationic Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, it has been found that as the chain length of the surfactant increases, there is a widening of the viscosity maximum as a result of an increase in the number of binding sites (41). This phenomenon can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Cationic Surfactantsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…pharmaceutical, biomedical application, detergency, enhanced oil recovery, paints, and food and mineral processing). [1][2][3] However, most of the studies focused on the structure of the aggregates made of surfactants and neutral polymers [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] or charged surfactants and oppositely charged polyelectrolytes in dilute solution, that is, systems in which phase separation does not occur. [11][12][13][14][15] The general picture about the interaction between surfactant and polyelectrolyte emerging from these studies is that the surfactant molecules adsorb on polyelectrolyte chains as micellar or micelle-like clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The complexity in the rheological properties of the associative polymer with hydrophobes attached as pendant side groups compared to the end-capped hydrophobic system is related to the steric hindrance of the polymer backbone that prevents the formation of hydrophobic junctions, yielding hydrophobic clusters with a polydispersed associative junctions. 3,9,11,[15][16][17][18] On the other hand, the combed-type polymer possesses a better viscosity enhancement characteristic than the end-capped system. 15,19 This is because the combed system is more efficient in creating bridges between micelles, yielding higher intermolecular associative junctions compared to HEUR system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the low molecular weight (as compared to HEUR system) of the polymer where chain entanglements are negligible at low to moderate concentrations. Several models such as the exponential stretch and multiple modes Maxwell model 15,16,22 were used to describe the behavior of such combed polymer system. However, they are unable to provide the qualitative and quantitative description of polymer system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%