2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3598-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on the Performance of High-Rate Activated Sludge System: a Pilot-Scale Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from full‐scale and pilot‐scale systems showed high variability in bioflocculation outcomes with ESS and COD capture fluctuating in a range of 10‐ to 120‐mg TSS/L (H. Guven et al, 2017; Jimenez et al, 2015; Ngo, Van Winckel, et al, 2021; Rahman et al, 2016, 2019; Rahman et al, 2020) and 21–55% (Dai et al, 2018; Dolejs et al, 2016; H. Guven et al, 2017; Jimenez et al, 2015; Meerburg et al, 2015; Rahman et al, 2020), respectively. This lined up with the significant variation of ESS (7‐ to 113‐mg TSS/L), TSS capture in clarifier (51 to 98%), and COD capture (median at 12% and varied from 0% to 49%) in Scenario A with no bioflocculation control (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data from full‐scale and pilot‐scale systems showed high variability in bioflocculation outcomes with ESS and COD capture fluctuating in a range of 10‐ to 120‐mg TSS/L (H. Guven et al, 2017; Jimenez et al, 2015; Ngo, Van Winckel, et al, 2021; Rahman et al, 2016, 2019; Rahman et al, 2020) and 21–55% (Dai et al, 2018; Dolejs et al, 2016; H. Guven et al, 2017; Jimenez et al, 2015; Meerburg et al, 2015; Rahman et al, 2020), respectively. This lined up with the significant variation of ESS (7‐ to 113‐mg TSS/L), TSS capture in clarifier (51 to 98%), and COD capture (median at 12% and varied from 0% to 49%) in Scenario A with no bioflocculation control (Figure 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from full-scale and pilot-scale systems showed high variability in bioflocculation outcomes with ESS and COD capture fluctuating in a range of 10-to 120-mg TSS/L (H. Guven et al, 2017;Jimenez et al, 2015;Ngo, Van Winckel, et al, 2021;Rahman et al, 2016Rahman et al, , 2019Rahman et al, 2020) and 21-55% (Dai et al, 2018;Dolejs et al, 2016;H. Guven et al, 2017;Jimenez et al, 2015;Meerburg et al, 2015;Rahman et al, 2020), respectively.…”
Section: Impact Of Bioflocculation Boundaries On Control Of High-rate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy savings of the sewage lifting angle needs to be comprehensively analyzed from the sewage lifting system. First of all, in the design stage of the sewage treatment process, it is necessary to broadly investigate the existing pipe network system and the whole process facilities of sewage treatment to minimize the wastewater elevation that needs to be upgraded with the elevation of the processing facility and consideration of the flooding flow mode [66].…”
Section: Advanced Energy Efficient Technologies For Wastewater Trementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different observations have been previously reported for the effect of the OLR (in the range of HRAS definition) on bioflocculation in non-membrane-based activated sludge processes. Some studies have reported improvement in bioflocculation with the increase in OLR, 4,22,23 another study increasing OLR led to an increase in the fraction of non-flocculating bacteria and a corresponding shift in the particle size distribution (PSD) of sludge particles towards smaller sizes. The positive effect of increasing OLR on bioflocculation has been attributed to the corresponding increase in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), whereas the negative effect was related to a decrease in the protein to carbohydrate ratio (EPS c /EPS p ) in EPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%