2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of human sperm freezing-thawing process on vitrification and conventional freezing: evaluation of survival, motility, DNA oxidation and mitochondrial activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have indicated no significant differences in sperm parameters between vitrified and frozen spermatozoa, 24,25 although some authors suggest vitrified samples exhibit increased sperm motility after warming. 15,[26][27][28][29] Therefore, after considering cryopreservation outcomes, in combination with the technical characteristics of each cryopreservation technique, it can be concluded that the utility of vitrification as a sperm cryopreservation option to be used routinely in clinical practice is still lacking evidence, since robust differences between sperm freezing and vitrification, in terms of the sample quality after cryopreservation, cannot yet be established. In contrast, slow freezing offers good thawing outcomes, in terms of sperm quality, as has been reported in the comparative studies summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Dry Ice Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have indicated no significant differences in sperm parameters between vitrified and frozen spermatozoa, 24,25 although some authors suggest vitrified samples exhibit increased sperm motility after warming. 15,[26][27][28][29] Therefore, after considering cryopreservation outcomes, in combination with the technical characteristics of each cryopreservation technique, it can be concluded that the utility of vitrification as a sperm cryopreservation option to be used routinely in clinical practice is still lacking evidence, since robust differences between sperm freezing and vitrification, in terms of the sample quality after cryopreservation, cannot yet be established. In contrast, slow freezing offers good thawing outcomes, in terms of sperm quality, as has been reported in the comparative studies summarised in Table 2.…”
Section: Dry Ice Freezingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Moreover, comparative studies of different cryopreservation protocols fail to find differences in sperm DNA integrity among the protocols studied. 20,22,[40][41][42][43][44] More remarkable is that most of these studies reported a high degree of DNA integrity, superior to 70%, after cryopreservation. 20,40,41,43,44 In contrast, some of these studies observed lower sperm DNA integrity, in the range of 15%, in thawed samples.…”
Section: Sperm Dna Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,22,[40][41][42][43][44] More remarkable is that most of these studies reported a high degree of DNA integrity, superior to 70%, after cryopreservation. 20,40,41,43,44 In contrast, some of these studies observed lower sperm DNA integrity, in the range of 15%, in thawed samples. 22,42 However, it is relevant to note that the sperm DNA integrity prior to cryopreservation is not available in these cases.…”
Section: Sperm Dna Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%