2022
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221099819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hospital Safety Net Burden on Survival for Patients With Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: Objective To examine factors associated with hospital safety net burden and its impact on survival for patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). Study Design Retrospective database study. Setting National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Methods SNSCC cases were identified in the National Cancer Database. Hospital safety net burden was defined by percentage of uninsured/Medicaid patients treated, namely ≤25% for low-burden hospitals, 26% to 75% for medium-burden hospitals, and >75% for high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the present findings, higher safety‐net burden status has also been associated with delayed time to treatment, similar or increased hospital LOS, and similar rates of surgical readmissions 9–11,13,14,16,19 . With regards to overall survival, previous studies have conflicted, demonstrating no difference for patients with sinonasal and oral cavity tumors, 11,15 but inferior overall survival for patients with laryngeal tumors treated at HBH 14 . Notably, many of these studies either did not include patients with OPSCC, or pooled all patients with head and neck cancer, which is a heterogenous population 9–16 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with the present findings, higher safety‐net burden status has also been associated with delayed time to treatment, similar or increased hospital LOS, and similar rates of surgical readmissions 9–11,13,14,16,19 . With regards to overall survival, previous studies have conflicted, demonstrating no difference for patients with sinonasal and oral cavity tumors, 11,15 but inferior overall survival for patients with laryngeal tumors treated at HBH 14 . Notably, many of these studies either did not include patients with OPSCC, or pooled all patients with head and neck cancer, which is a heterogenous population 9–16 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study, no differences in CDCC score were found between patients treated at HBH, MBH, or LBH. Previous studies have conflicted on the potential association between comorbidities and treating hospital safety‐net burden, with several studies finding that higher burden hospitals were more likely to treat patients with more comorbidities, whereas other studies have found no difference, similar to the present analysis 10,12–15 . Nevertheless, by including CDCC score as one of the covariates in our multivariable‐adjusted analyses, we were able to account for any potential impact from differences in patient comorbidities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Early speci c symptoms of the disease are relatively absent given the anatomy of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses patients, usually presenting at an advanced stage by the time of diagnosis. There is an urgent need for parameters that can assist in early diagnosis [3]. Furthermore, despite the declining incidence of SNSCC and improvement in the treatment of SNSCC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate has not signi cantly improved over the past 50 years and still lingers at 30%-50%, with local recurrence being the leading cause of death [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%