Abstract:Introduction:
Aim of study is to investigate the effect of hip prosthesis on 6 and 15 MV photon beam energies.
Materials and Methods:
Prosthesis was kept at the level of tray position. The measurements were done on Varian Clinac-iX linac. Customized prosthesis, termed as Prosthetic Metal Implant (PMI) was made up of wrought austenitic stainless steel rod and covered with paraffin-wax. ‘Standard prosthesis’ was made up of wrought titanium alloy. The dose profiles were me… Show more
“…There were many publications on the planning of hip implant patients. [ 4 16 32 33 ] For the hip prosthesis patients, the optimization strategies used in our study were less explored. We used seven fields for IMRT plans and two arcs for the VMAT plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiotherapy (RT) starts with the simulation of a patient and computed tomography (CT) images are standard 3-dimensional (3D) imaging procedure for RT patients. The presence of metal in the treatment region changes the attenuation profiles of photon beams passing through it[ 4 ] because of these profiles and scattered photons different artifacts are produced in the CT images. [ 5 6 7 ] A few artifacts seen during CT procedures are streaking, shading, rings, and distortions.…”
Purpose:
To study the impact of different optimization methods in dealing with metallic hip implant using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques.
Materials and Methods:
A cohort of 16 patients having metallic implants was selected for the study. Three sets of IMRT and VMAT plans were generated. Set 1 IMRT (IM_Base), VMAT (VM_Base) without any restrictions on beam entry and exit, set 2 (IM_ENT and VM_ENT) optimizer restricts the beam entry and set 3 (IM_EXT+ENT), neither entry nor exit doses were allowed toward the metallic implant.
Results:
There was no significant difference in target (D
95%
) and organ-at-risk doses between IM_Base and IM_ENT. There were significant (
P
= 0.002) improvements in planning target volume (PTV) V
95%
and homogeneity from IM_EXT+ENT to IM_ENT. There was no significant difference in plan quality between VM_Base and VM_ENT. There were significant (
P
= 0.005) improvements in PTV, V
95%,
homogeneity from VM_EXT+ENT to VM_ENT. V
40Gy
, V
30Gy
for bladder, rectum, bowel, and bowel maximum dose decreases significantly (
P
< 0.005) in IM_ENT compared to IM_EXT+ENT, but not significant for VMAT plans. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in dose spill outside target (
P
< 0.05) comparing 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% dose spills for IM_ENT compared to IM_EXT+ENT, but variations among VMAT plans are insignificant. VMAT plans were always superior to IMRT plans for the same optimization methods.
Conclusion:
The best approach is to plan hip prosthesis cases with blocked entry of radiation beam for IMRT and VMAT. The VMAT plans had more volumetric coverage, fewer hotspots, and lesser heterogeneity.
“…There were many publications on the planning of hip implant patients. [ 4 16 32 33 ] For the hip prosthesis patients, the optimization strategies used in our study were less explored. We used seven fields for IMRT plans and two arcs for the VMAT plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiotherapy (RT) starts with the simulation of a patient and computed tomography (CT) images are standard 3-dimensional (3D) imaging procedure for RT patients. The presence of metal in the treatment region changes the attenuation profiles of photon beams passing through it[ 4 ] because of these profiles and scattered photons different artifacts are produced in the CT images. [ 5 6 7 ] A few artifacts seen during CT procedures are streaking, shading, rings, and distortions.…”
Purpose:
To study the impact of different optimization methods in dealing with metallic hip implant using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques.
Materials and Methods:
A cohort of 16 patients having metallic implants was selected for the study. Three sets of IMRT and VMAT plans were generated. Set 1 IMRT (IM_Base), VMAT (VM_Base) without any restrictions on beam entry and exit, set 2 (IM_ENT and VM_ENT) optimizer restricts the beam entry and set 3 (IM_EXT+ENT), neither entry nor exit doses were allowed toward the metallic implant.
Results:
There was no significant difference in target (D
95%
) and organ-at-risk doses between IM_Base and IM_ENT. There were significant (
P
= 0.002) improvements in planning target volume (PTV) V
95%
and homogeneity from IM_EXT+ENT to IM_ENT. There was no significant difference in plan quality between VM_Base and VM_ENT. There were significant (
P
= 0.005) improvements in PTV, V
95%,
homogeneity from VM_EXT+ENT to VM_ENT. V
40Gy
, V
30Gy
for bladder, rectum, bowel, and bowel maximum dose decreases significantly (
P
< 0.005) in IM_ENT compared to IM_EXT+ENT, but not significant for VMAT plans. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in dose spill outside target (
P
< 0.05) comparing 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70% dose spills for IM_ENT compared to IM_EXT+ENT, but variations among VMAT plans are insignificant. VMAT plans were always superior to IMRT plans for the same optimization methods.
Conclusion:
The best approach is to plan hip prosthesis cases with blocked entry of radiation beam for IMRT and VMAT. The VMAT plans had more volumetric coverage, fewer hotspots, and lesser heterogeneity.
“…Stainless steel is widely used in bone fixation, cardiovascular systems, catheters, surgical instruments and dental crowns ( 30 ). Furthermore, Bhushan et al ( 27 ) studied the effect of stainless-steel hip prosthesis on radiation using a customized prosthesis containing wrought austenitic stainless steel. It was observed that for 6 MV of photon irradiation, at a depth of 10 cm below the prosthesis, with field sizes of 5x5, 10x10 and 20x20, the dose attenuation was 8.3, 7.4 and 7.5% when the prosthesis was present compared with in its absence.…”
Section: The Effect Of Different Kind Of Metal Implants On Dosagementioning
Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the most widely used and effective cancer treatments. With the increasing need for organ reconstruction and advancements in material technology, an increasing number of patients with cancer have metallic implants. These implants can affect RT dosage and clinical outcomes, warranting careful consideration by oncologists. The present review discussed the mechanisms by which different types of metallic implants impact various stages of the RT process, examined methods to mitigate these effects during treatment, and discussed the clinical implications of metallic implants on RT outcomes. In summary, when metallic implants are present within the RT field, oncologists should carefully assess their impact on the treatment.
“…All these information are required for executing the dose computations with precision. Bhushan et al [5] reported that dose perturbation changes with a factor for different energies also. Patients had already completed the total course of treatment.…”
Background
The number of people with implanted hip prosthesis has grown worldwide. For radiotherapy planning of patients with hip implants, few main challenges are encountered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of different planning algorithms in the presence of high-density metallic implant in the treatment of patients with carcinoma cervix.
Results
It was found that D98% were 44.49 ± 0.11, 44.51 ± 0.13, 44.39 ± 0.22, and 44.45 ± 0.16 Gy for 4FMC6MV (4-field technique calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithm and 6 MV photon energy), 4FMC6MV_WP (4-field technique calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithm and 6 MV photon energy without prosthesis), 4FCC6MV (4-field technique calculated with collapse-cone-convolution algorithm and 6 MV photon energy), and 4FCC6MV_WP (4-field technique calculated with collapse-cone-convolution algorithm and 6 MV photon energy without prosthesis) respectively. Similarly, D2% were 49.40 ± 0.84, 49.05 ± 0.76, 48.97 ± 0.91, and 48.57 ± 0.85 Gray (Gy) for 4FMC6MV, 4FMC6MV_WP, 4FCC6MV, and 4FCC6MV_WP respectively. The present study has not suggested any major difference between the Monte-Carlo (MC) and collapse-cone-convolution (CCC) calculation algorithm in the presence of high-Z metallic implants. Volume of bowel receiving 15 Gy dose has shown a significant difference with prosthesis cases. This study investigates that hip prosthesis creates considerable changes in the treatment planning of cervical malignancies.
Conclusion
CCC algorithm is in good agreement with MC calculation algorithm in the presence of high-density metallic implants in terms of target coverage and avoidance organ sparing except few parameters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.