2014
DOI: 10.15446/dyna.v81n185.35762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heating systems in litter quality in broiler facilities in winter conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A situation of thermal discomfort was also observed by Vigoderis et al (2014). Hernandez et al (2016a), on the other hand, observed THI values during the first two weeks of life of birds within their thermal comfort zone, but this comfort was only found in the region near the heating system.…”
Section: Indoor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…A situation of thermal discomfort was also observed by Vigoderis et al (2014). Hernandez et al (2016a), on the other hand, observed THI values during the first two weeks of life of birds within their thermal comfort zone, but this comfort was only found in the region near the heating system.…”
Section: Indoor Environmentmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Litter samples were weighed, dried at 105°C for 48 h, and weighed again to determine moisture content. A 10 g subsample of fresh litter was solubilized in 100 mL of distilled water and pH measurements were performed using a pH meter according to methods of Brauer-Vigoderis et al (2014) . Xylanase and protease activities in the diets were analyzed using methods based on dye-labeled substrates (Azo-Xylan and Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA, respectively).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litter moisture (%) was determined using the gravimetric method by calculating weight loss after drying, whereas pH was determined electrometrically using a WTW inoLab pH 720 pH meter (Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten GmbH, Weilheim, Germany). More detailed descriptions are available elsewhere ( 8 , 34 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%