2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02853.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Heat Processing on DNA Quantification of Meat Species

Abstract: In this study, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for identifying the effects of different temperatures and times of heat treatment on the DNA of meat products. For this purpose, beef, pork, and chicken were baked at 200 °C for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 min, and for 30 min at 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210 °C and also cooked by boiling at 99 °C for 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 min. The DNA was then extracted from all samples after the heat treatment. Further, a region of 374, 290, and 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The processed sample volume was smaller but was still adequate for DNA extraction and LAMP assay detection. These results are consistent with previous reports (Sakalar et al 2012;Karabasanavar et al 2014). However, Buntjer and Brodmann failed to detect target DNA Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Meat Processing On the Lamp Assaysupporting
confidence: 96%
“…The processed sample volume was smaller but was still adequate for DNA extraction and LAMP assay detection. These results are consistent with previous reports (Sakalar et al 2012;Karabasanavar et al 2014). However, Buntjer and Brodmann failed to detect target DNA Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Meat Processing On the Lamp Assaysupporting
confidence: 96%
“…In recent decades, Reid et al 2006;Karlsson and Holmlund 2007;Soares et al 2013). Although PCR quantification applied to food analysis still raises various analytical problems, such as lack of certified reference standards and effect of food technologies (Sakalar et al 2012), qualitative PCR analysis targeted mitochondrial DNA is suitable for monitoring mixed-meat products in official food safety controls (Matsunaga et al 1999;Ballin 2010;Ghovvati et al 2009;Linacre 2012;Amaral et al 2014). Specifically, the species-specific DNA detection assay described can easily be performed as an initial screening tool, thus achieving considerable savings on analytical costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported lower efficiency of these methods in highly processed samples has been linked to processing conditions, thermal denaturation and degradation of the markers compounds monitored (typically DNA or protein epitope) and problems with cross-reactivity http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.078 0308-8146/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. between species giving unreliable results (Arslan, Irfan-Ilhak, & Calicioglu, 2006;Musto, Faraone, Cellini, & Musto, 2014;S ßakalar, Abasiyanik, Bektik, & Tayyrov, 2012). The difficulty with reliable multiplex detection in a single test and contamination of DNA from other organisms also place severe limitations on analysis of complex samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%