2018
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1541478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of gastroprotective agents on upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The indications for NOACs in the four studies were the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or other patients who need prevention or treatment of acute vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism, while others only enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation. As for NOAC types, three studies focused only on dabigatran, while the other three studies also focused on other NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), 11,12,14 two of which performed subgroup analyses. 12,14 As for intervention, four studies enrolled patients undergoing PPIs or H2RAs co-therapy, and the other two studies included those who were concomitantly administered with PPIs, although none of them had further analyzed the two different types of acid suppressants or different types of PPIs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The indications for NOACs in the four studies were the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation or other patients who need prevention or treatment of acute vein thrombosis or pulmonary thromboembolism, while others only enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation. As for NOAC types, three studies focused only on dabigatran, while the other three studies also focused on other NOACs (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban), 11,12,14 two of which performed subgroup analyses. 12,14 As for intervention, four studies enrolled patients undergoing PPIs or H2RAs co-therapy, and the other two studies included those who were concomitantly administered with PPIs, although none of them had further analyzed the two different types of acid suppressants or different types of PPIs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, six retrospective studies and only one RCT were identified. 8,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Considering the differences in study design, evaluation methods, and evidence levels between RCTs and retrospective studies, we included six retrospective studies in the final meta-analysis. 8,[11][12][13][14][15]…”
Section: Study Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescriptions for PPI and antacids prior to hospitalization were equally distributed in both groups. Although prophylactic prescription of PPIs can reduce the incidence of GIBs in high-risk patients receiving DOACs 29 , 95 patients (38.5%) did not receive a gastroprotective drug such as a PPI prior to hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, PPIs can cause abdominal pain, nausea, headache, diarrhea, osteoporosis, and fractures, in addition to pneumonia, insomnia, and kidney inflammation ( Amang et al, 2017 ), and be associated with an increased gastric cancer risk ( Weltermann et al, 2021 ). The long-term use of H2Ras can lead to the development of galactorrhea in women, gynecomastia in men, and alteration of the bacterial flora of the gastrointestinal tract ( Youn et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PPIs and H2Ras can also lead to rapid tolerance during treatment, followed by a rebound effect of gastric hypersecretion after withdrawal of the drug, and ulcers may develop again ( Youn et al, 2018 ). Therefore, it is necessary to investigate new therapeutic alternatives with fewer adverse effects, which stimulate the ulcer healing process and prevent new relapses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%