2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of free and encapsulated Pseudomonas putida CC-FR2-4 and Bacillus subtilis CC-pg104 on plant growth under gnotobiotic conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
39
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trend of solubilization was observed with ER phosphate also. This may be attributed to the survival of bacterial cells from newly introduced environment and thereby reducing cell loss in immobilized form (Rekha et al, 2007). Immobilization provides protective environment with nutrient source (Saxena, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trend of solubilization was observed with ER phosphate also. This may be attributed to the survival of bacterial cells from newly introduced environment and thereby reducing cell loss in immobilized form (Rekha et al, 2007). Immobilization provides protective environment with nutrient source (Saxena, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we have opted to use calcium alginate hydrogel that is gelled by ionic bonds and swells and dissolves in a solution containing phosphates, a chelating agent present in the soil [6]. Although several biomaterials are available, the alginate is preferred because the capsules are formed instantaneously by one-step gelling with cell loss reduced to a minimum [25] and the microbial cell density could be maintained as high as high as 10 10 -10 11 CFUg -1 of capsule [8]. In our study, we achieved a concentration of 8.08 Log CFU.g -1 of bacteria in freeze-dried microcapsules and a survival rate of 14%; a concentration close to what was achieved under similar conditions (8.28 Log CFU.g -1 ) with Lactoacillus casei [14].…”
Section: Survival Of B Subtilis B26mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encapsulation of living cells in polymeric gels is a well-established technology suitable for a wide range of applications [4,7]. Several studies thus far have used alginate matrix as the encapsulating material since it forms microbeads instantaneously in the presence of polyvalent cations such as calcium [6,8]. Alginate beads have several positive attributes: (i) they are capable of entrapping a sufficient number of bacteria [9]; (ii) they protect the cells by providing a pre-defined and constant microenvironment thus allowing the cells to survive and maintain metabolic activity for extended period of time, and (iii) they provide a controlled release of microroganisms as well as serve as energy source for the microorganisms [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…비록 대상 식물 종과 환 경조건이 다르지만 alginate에 고정한 Pseudomonas fluorescens BAM-4와 Burkholderia cepacia BAM-12가 밀의 shoot 길이 생 장을 비접종 대조군보다30-40% 정도 증가시킨 결과보다 우수 하였으며 (Minaxi, 2011), 상추(Lectuca sativa)를 대상으로 humic acid를 첨가한 alginate에 Pseudomonas putida CC-FR2-4를 고 정화하여 접종했을 때 현탁액 접종보다 shoot와 뿌리 길이가 5-10% 정도로 생장이 증가한 결과와 유사하였다 (Rekha et al, 2007). 현탁액 접종에 비해 고정화 균주 접종의 식물생장 촉진효 과가 높은 것은 고정화 균주가 한꺼번에 방출되지 않고 지속적 으로 식물 근권에 공급되며 안정적으로 식물생장 촉진활성을 나 타내기 때문인 것으로 추정된다 (Vassilev et al, 2001;Rekha et al, 2007). 한편 균주 비함유 control alginate bead 실험군은 비 접종 대조군에 비해 토마토의 shoot 길이, 뿌리길이, 습윤중량과 건조중량이 각각 3.9, 2.6, 13.7과 17.7% 증가하였으나 유의성은 나타나지 않았다.…”
Section: 세균군집 Dna 추출 및 증폭unclassified
“…이제까지 고정화 PGPR 균주에 의한 식물생장촉진 연구는 많 았지만 균주의 근권 잔류에 대해서는 조사하지 않거나 (Rekha et al, 2007;Schoebitz et al, 2014) 고정화 담체에서 방출되는 생 균수만을 측정한 경우가 대부분이었으며 (Bashan et al, 2002;Minaxi, 2011 …”
unclassified