2003
DOI: 10.1017/s003118200300307x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fox, pig, sheep, and poultry bile on the establishment of domestic and sylvatic species of Trichinella in rats

Abstract: Most sylvatic species of Trichinella are known to have poor infectivity to rats, but in the present study oral administration of bile from other hosts appeared to modify this infectivity. A total of 75 rats were inoculated in groups of 25 with 3 species of Trichinella (T. spiralis, T. nativa, and T. nelsoni) and each group of rats was given per os daily doses of bile from pig, sheep, chicken and fox respectively (4 x 5 rats). As a control 1 group of 5 rats was given daily doses of water. Whereas, the addition … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ELISA and blotting assays used in the present study are probably more sensitive methods of detecting Trichinella infection than either trichinoscopy or muscle digestion, the seroprevalences and seroconversions recorded in 2000-2002 are worrying. Similarly, even though the sample was small, the prevalence recorded in the rodents (15.4%) is also cause for concern, indicating that, as observed in other regions of the world (Loufty et al, 1999;Theodoropoulos et al, 2003), a 'reservoir' of Trichinella may be maintained by horizontal transmission among local rats and mice, even in the absence of pigs. Rodent densities in the study area (as indicated by the 2.7 rodents caught/100 trap-nights) appear much lower than those recorded, by Larrieu et al (2002), elsewhere in Río Negro province (12-35 rodents/100 trap-nights).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Although the ELISA and blotting assays used in the present study are probably more sensitive methods of detecting Trichinella infection than either trichinoscopy or muscle digestion, the seroprevalences and seroconversions recorded in 2000-2002 are worrying. Similarly, even though the sample was small, the prevalence recorded in the rodents (15.4%) is also cause for concern, indicating that, as observed in other regions of the world (Loufty et al, 1999;Theodoropoulos et al, 2003), a 'reservoir' of Trichinella may be maintained by horizontal transmission among local rats and mice, even in the absence of pigs. Rodent densities in the study area (as indicated by the 2.7 rodents caught/100 trap-nights) appear much lower than those recorded, by Larrieu et al (2002), elsewhere in Río Negro province (12-35 rodents/100 trap-nights).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%