2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of formation conditions on biochars: Compositional and structural properties of cellulose, lignin, and pine biochars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yielding capacity and consecutive weight loss: The yielding capacity of biochars greatly varied depending on the feedstock type because a feedstock material typically comprises labile and recalcitrant oxygen and hydrogen containing fractions (Rutherford et al 2013), the earlier one is rapidly lost after the initial heating which causes the massive weight loss of feedstock. The corn cob is the only feedstock that converted more than 50% of its mass to biochar allowing it to yield highest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yielding capacity and consecutive weight loss: The yielding capacity of biochars greatly varied depending on the feedstock type because a feedstock material typically comprises labile and recalcitrant oxygen and hydrogen containing fractions (Rutherford et al 2013), the earlier one is rapidly lost after the initial heating which causes the massive weight loss of feedstock. The corn cob is the only feedstock that converted more than 50% of its mass to biochar allowing it to yield highest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aromaticity and degree of aromatic condensation is governed mainly by the highest heat treatment temperature -HTT (Keiluweit et al, 2010;Zimmerman, 2010;McBeath et al, 2011), although other pyrolysis parameters, such as: residence time (Knicker et al, 2005;Melligan et al, 2012;Rutherford et al, 2012); O 2 availability (Ascough et al, 2008); and pressure (Melligan et al, 2011), as well as the precursor biomass (Wiedemeier et al, 2015), can also significantly affect these fundamental chemical properties of biochar. These properties can be assessed by several analytical methods, described and evaluated by Wiedemeier et al (2015): chemical (elemental; BPCA; and lipid analyses); spectroscopic (Infrared; NEXAFS; and 13 C NMR spectroscopies); and physical (helium pycnometry: skeletal density, which is the sample mass divided by its skeletal volume, where skeletal volume is the volume occupied by the solid sample and any pores not accessible to the gas analysis).…”
Section: Characterization Of Biocharmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,11 Wastes from the agricultural industry constitute a relevant renewable source of carbon present mainly in the form of cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and other substances. 12 The lignocellulosic biomass from the bark of black wattle (Acacia mearnsii De Wild. ), a plant native to Australia cultivated commercially in the Southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, is a good example of this type residue that may be used as adsorbent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%