2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fin configuration parameters on performance of solar still: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absorber plate is the essential component of solar still. An energy absorption rate of the basin affects how much freshwater distilled by the solar still; hence, (Mevada et al 2020) reported that the absorber with the bigger area is desirable. Nevertheless, making the basin area larger directly means the increase of size and space which influences the economic efficiency of a solar still.…”
Section: Single Basin With Special Coversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absorber plate is the essential component of solar still. An energy absorption rate of the basin affects how much freshwater distilled by the solar still; hence, (Mevada et al 2020) reported that the absorber with the bigger area is desirable. Nevertheless, making the basin area larger directly means the increase of size and space which influences the economic efficiency of a solar still.…”
Section: Single Basin With Special Coversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widespread reviews of solar stills have been undertaken to compare their thermal performance and to introduce promised technique as well as advanced material for them, such as performance of the integration between solar still with various solar collectors was carried out in the study (Sathyamurthy et al 2017), optimum values of a passive solar still parameter and good design for southern Bangladesh was done by (Sarkar et al 2017), (Omara et al 2017a) undertook the cooling techniques review for solar stills, Performance of solar still with reflectors was investigated in (Omara et al 2017b), (Shukla et al 2017) reviewed latent heat energy storage using in solar still, (Sharshir et al 2017) reviewed energy and exergy analysis for solar stills, Application of nano particle in solar distillation of water was reviewed in (Parikh 2018), a review of nano fluids usage in solar stills for improvement of heat and mass transfer was conducted by (Bait & Si-Ameur 2018), (Arunkumar et al 2013a) summarized solar stills had efficient high productivity, how fin configuration parameters influence on solar still performance was answered in review of (Mevada et al 2020). Furthermore, parameter influences on the daily productivity including climatic, design, and operational parameters were presented by Muftah et al (Muftah et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to modifications, they achieved a 40% higher distillate productivity than a conventional solar still. Mevada et al [35] reviewed different attachments of fins and found that increasing the height of the fins resulted an enhanced efficiency of the solar still. Sharshir et al [36] used evacuated tubes and nanofluids with a pyramid-shaped solar still and compared the experiment with a conventional still.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional SS consists of an inclined glass cover, a rectangular basin that contains saltwater, and thermally insulated from both sides and bottom. Some modifications have been conducted on basin; such as: stepped SS [8], finned SS [9] and wick SS [10]. Some other modifications have been done on the glass cover; such as: double slope SS [11], and pyramid SS integrated with nanofluid and evacuated tubes [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%