1996
DOI: 10.13031/2013.27501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Filling Method on Load Distribution in Model Grain Bins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When there are variations of approximately ±10% in the bulk density of the filling, the lateral pressure differs greatly (approximately 45%), which also indicates a change in the lateral pressure coefficient k = σ3/σ1; conversely, the lateral pressure rises with the increase in the angle . Molenda et al [7] and Tong et al [11] have found similar tendencies with the change in lateral coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When there are variations of approximately ±10% in the bulk density of the filling, the lateral pressure differs greatly (approximately 45%), which also indicates a change in the lateral pressure coefficient k = σ3/σ1; conversely, the lateral pressure rises with the increase in the angle . Molenda et al [7] and Tong et al [11] have found similar tendencies with the change in lateral coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, Janssen did not pay attention to the methods of filling and their influence on the lateral pressure in the closely spaced walls. This question was considered much later by scientists such as J. Nielsen [6], M. Molenda et al [7,8], G.K. Klein [9], and A.V. Shkola [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Loads were measured with an accuracy of ± 0.5 N through a data acquisition system. The experimental set-up allowed for the determination of the distribution of vertical pressure on the bottom σ v between 5 rings, mean lateral pressure σ n , and shear stress τ on the wall (Molenda et al, 1996a). The apparent coefficient of wall friction µ* was determined as the ratio of mean shear stress τ to mean lateral pressure σ n .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eurocode, as well as the majority of published analyses considered cylindrical sample under axi-symmetrical stress with the assumption of material isotropy. Numerous examinations have pointed to considerable anisotropy of granular materials dependent on the shapes of particles and method of generation of the bedding [20,24]. Therefore for this study the uniaxial apparatus of rectangular cross section was constructed to measure loads in the two perpendicular horizontal directions x and y in the sample undergoing deformation in the vertical direction z.…”
Section: Uniaxial Confined Compression Testmentioning
confidence: 99%