2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of filler surface properties on structure, mechanical and tribological behavior of PTFE-carbon black composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have been quite interesting but, at the end it has been seen that such fillers compromise PTFE's attractive low friction properties (μ<0.1) even if wear of said composites in comparison with virgin PTFE is further reduced [2]. Furthermore, the disadvantage of using hard phases in soft matrix is well known, that is, the possibility of transfer film removal and the aggressive abrasion of the hard counterface if the hard phases are released to the interface as a third body due to loosening of the bond between the filler and the polymer matrix: it was found that the particles used as fillers were rubbed off during the test, highlighting the weakness between the transfer film and the countersurface [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been quite interesting but, at the end it has been seen that such fillers compromise PTFE's attractive low friction properties (μ<0.1) even if wear of said composites in comparison with virgin PTFE is further reduced [2]. Furthermore, the disadvantage of using hard phases in soft matrix is well known, that is, the possibility of transfer film removal and the aggressive abrasion of the hard counterface if the hard phases are released to the interface as a third body due to loosening of the bond between the filler and the polymer matrix: it was found that the particles used as fillers were rubbed off during the test, highlighting the weakness between the transfer film and the countersurface [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increase of the Al ions implantation dose, nano composite films were more uniform and more consistent performance in the same ions and energy, and modification effect of PTFE was the best at implantation dose of 1×10 16 ions/cm 3 . The best metal ion was Al, implantation dose was 1×10 16 ions/cm 3 , implantation energy was 20Kev by SRIM optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In Figure 4 . In Figure 4(d), the dose of implantation ions was 1×10 16 ions/cm 3 , the average dose of impurities was 2.7× 10 19 ions/cm 3 . With the gradually increase of the implantation ions dose, the range of implantation ions had only a very small fluctuations.…”
Section: Projected Range Distribution With Different Implantations Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations