2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fiber, matrix and interface properties on the in-plane shear deformation of carbon-fiber reinforced composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
120
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A description of the various mechanical characteristics are shown in Figure 11b. Strain hardening is expected to be a consequence of fibre rotation (the scissoring action of the fibres, aligning themselves to the stress field) [43], whereas the necking phase is expected to be the result of the fibre scissoring (rotation), inducing stress inwards, contributing to a Poisson contraction. In addition to the fibre rotation, the orientation of the fibres hinders transverse crack propagation, allowing for progressive failure (as opposed to the tensile tested specimens).…”
Section: In-plane Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A description of the various mechanical characteristics are shown in Figure 11b. Strain hardening is expected to be a consequence of fibre rotation (the scissoring action of the fibres, aligning themselves to the stress field) [43], whereas the necking phase is expected to be the result of the fibre scissoring (rotation), inducing stress inwards, contributing to a Poisson contraction. In addition to the fibre rotation, the orientation of the fibres hinders transverse crack propagation, allowing for progressive failure (as opposed to the tensile tested specimens).…”
Section: In-plane Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the fibre rotation, the orientation of the fibres hinders transverse crack propagation, allowing for progressive failure (as opposed to the tensile tested specimens). Interfacial de-bonding of the fibre from the matrix does not occur until a high shear strain is reached [43] with the ultimate failure of the ±45 o woven fibre composites occurring due to the fibre breakage and pull-out [21]. The SR-CFRP displayed a large extension of the strain-hardening regime, resulting in an overall larger extension to failure compared to the other materials.…”
Section: In-plane Shear Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Note that this situation contrasts markedly with RVE models used to compute the deformation response of polymer matrix composites (PMCs). In PMCs undergoing plastic deformation, the length of the RVE can be taken to be arbitrarily small, thereby allowing for a large number of fibers with non-uniform spacing to be readily tackled with existing computational capabilities (see, for instance, Totry et al, 2010).) In order to strike a balance between computational efficiency and model accuracy, we assume here that the fibers are arranged in a regular, square array and that the matrix cracks are evenly spaced.…”
Section: Geometry and Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasticity was employed to model the non-linear response of the matrix and failure was introduced by allowing the fiber-matrix interface to debond using cohesive zone elements. [17][18][19] The response of a statistical sample of RUCs subjected to a combination of transverse compressive and transverse shear was reported. In the current work, the focus is restricted to the microscale to evaluate the capabilities of the smeared crack band model to predict progressive failure evolution within a composite microstructure, using the semi-analytical methods (GMC and HFGMC), by verifying and validating this implementation, as well as the overall utility of the micromechanics models employed, against available experimental data, and an analogous, fully numerical (FEM) model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%