2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fenton pre-oxidation on mobilization of nutrients and efficient subsequent bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, negligible degradation (< 5%) was observed when both oxidants were applied alone or with soluble Fe(II) (data not shown). Xu et al (2017) also reported a comparable oxidation efficiency by H 2 O 2 in the presence or 243 absence of Fe(II) at circumneutral pH (6.5 -7) in loamy soil highlighting the inability of Fe(II) to act as a catalyst. They observed that use of H 2 O 2 (225, 450 and 900 mM) with soluble Fe(II) (2.9 mM) resulted in total petroleum hydrocarbon removal of 2, 15, and 25%, 246 respectively whereas a comparable oxidation efficiency was noted by H 2 O 2 without Fe(II) of 247 1, 17, and 22%, respectively (Xu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Chemical Oxidation Of Contaminated Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, negligible degradation (< 5%) was observed when both oxidants were applied alone or with soluble Fe(II) (data not shown). Xu et al (2017) also reported a comparable oxidation efficiency by H 2 O 2 in the presence or 243 absence of Fe(II) at circumneutral pH (6.5 -7) in loamy soil highlighting the inability of Fe(II) to act as a catalyst. They observed that use of H 2 O 2 (225, 450 and 900 mM) with soluble Fe(II) (2.9 mM) resulted in total petroleum hydrocarbon removal of 2, 15, and 25%, 246 respectively whereas a comparable oxidation efficiency was noted by H 2 O 2 without Fe(II) of 247 1, 17, and 22%, respectively (Xu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Chemical Oxidation Of Contaminated Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Xu et al (2017) also reported a comparable oxidation efficiency by H 2 O 2 in the presence or 243 absence of Fe(II) at circumneutral pH (6.5 -7) in loamy soil highlighting the inability of Fe(II) to act as a catalyst. They observed that use of H 2 O 2 (225, 450 and 900 mM) with soluble Fe(II) (2.9 mM) resulted in total petroleum hydrocarbon removal of 2, 15, and 25%, 246 respectively whereas a comparable oxidation efficiency was noted by H 2 O 2 without Fe(II) of 247 1, 17, and 22%, respectively (Xu et al, 2017). It should, however, be noted that total concentration of native Fe(II) in their soil was 4.8 g kg -1 which could explain the reported oxidation efficiency without any added Fe(II) by Xu et al (2017).…”
Section: Chemical Oxidation Of Contaminated Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until now, different physicochemical, thermal, and biological methods have been applied for decontamination of polluted soils. However, these methods are often costly and energy-intensive, and are almost ineffective and could, in turn, remain secondary toxic materials, which are potentially harmful to the environment [8][9][10][11] . Thus, electrochemical removal has been considered as a reliable technology for the remediation of contaminated soils 12,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high concentration of oxidants can cause serious damage to indigenous hydrocarbon degraders (IHD), making their recovery during bioremediation difficult, resulting in poor subsequent sustainable biodegradation of TPH . Previous studies by the present authors reported that the population of residual IHD decreased by three orders of magnitude (from 2.5 × 10 8 cfu g −1 soil to 7.9 × 10 5 cfu g −1 soil), after increasing the concentration of H 2 O 2 from 225 to 900 mmol L −1 , and the biodegradation of TPH after Fenton pre‐oxidation with 900 mmol L −1 H 2 O 2 was only 60% of that after Fenton pre‐oxidation with 225 mmol L −1 H 2 O 2 . However, a lower concentration of ammonium‐nitrogen (NH 4 + ‐N) was produced only with the lower concentration of oxidants, which was not beneficial to subsequent sustainable bioremediation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%