2003
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.10115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of felid activity on zoo visitor interest

Abstract: The extent to which the presence of zoo visitors influences animal behavior, and the ways in which animal activity influences visitor interest and perception, are of great interest to zoological parks. Visitors have been variously characterized as being enriching for zoo animals, as being stressors, and generally as influencing behavior in measurable ways. Most studies have focused on primates, and have assumed a ''visitor effect'' paradigm (i.e., visitors influence animal behavior). Here we present findings f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
99
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
99
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Sin embargo, aspectos relacionados al cuidado, tales como la reducci贸n de ruidos durante el periodo de visitas o los cambios en las interacciones entre el cuidador y el animal pueden ser considerados en esta pr谩ctica. Asimismo, el enriquecimiento puede mejorar la experiencia de los visitantes en un zool贸gico, no s贸lo porque es m谩s interesante observar animales activos en los encierros (Margulis et al 2003), sino tambi茅n porque los visitantes pueden aprender m谩s acerca de los animales si 茅stos despliegan comportamientos parecidos a los exhibidos en la naturaleza (Jones et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sin embargo, aspectos relacionados al cuidado, tales como la reducci贸n de ruidos durante el periodo de visitas o los cambios en las interacciones entre el cuidador y el animal pueden ser considerados en esta pr谩ctica. Asimismo, el enriquecimiento puede mejorar la experiencia de los visitantes en un zool贸gico, no s贸lo porque es m谩s interesante observar animales activos en los encierros (Margulis et al 2003), sino tambi茅n porque los visitantes pueden aprender m谩s acerca de los animales si 茅stos despliegan comportamientos parecidos a los exhibidos en la naturaleza (Jones et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Nuestros resultados coinciden con lo encontrado por estas autoras, y los datos de ambos estudios sugieren la necesidad de que la aplicaci贸n del enriquecimiento debe ser continua. Como lo mencionan previamente otros estudios (Sheperdson 1998, Margulis et al 2003, nuestros resultados sugieren que el enriquecimiento es una opci贸n "amigable" y barata para disminuir las estereotipias. Bajo esta pr谩ctica los animales pueden elegir interactuar o no con los objetos, alimentos y/o est铆mulos aplicados.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The activities of felids are not typically affected by the presence of zoo visitors (Margulis et al 2003), which allowed for the observed behaviors to be isolated from external factors. Periods of time when the animals' behaviors were influenced by the presence of a keeper, such as during the daily keeper talk (when a treat was often given), were omitted from analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is less clear whether there is a visitor density effect on other mammals commonly housed in zoos, due in part to the relatively few visitor effect studies carried out on non-primates. Some felids, for example, appear to show little or no behavioural response to visitors (Margulis et al, 2003, O'Donovan et al, 1993, whereas other studies report a visitor density influence on the behaviour of zoo-housed cats Chellam, 2002, Sellinger andHa, 2005). Ungulates have not been widely studied in this context, but sika deer (Cervus nippon; Shen-Jin et al, 2010) and Soemmerring's gazelle (Gazella soemmerringii; Mansour et al2000) both show increased alertness as visitor density increases, and higher levels of aggression have been found in gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus; Sekar et al, 2008) and blackbuck (Antilope cervicapra; Rajagopal et al, 2011) when visitor pressure is high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%