Effect of Feedback Regarding Urinary Cotinine and Brief Tailored Advice on Home Smoking Restrictions among Low-Income Parents of Children with Asthma: A Controlled Trial

Wakefield, Melanie; Banham, David; McCaul, Kieran; Martin, James; Ruffin, Richard E.; Badcock, N R; Roberts, Lyn

doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0953

Cited by 72 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97] The trials were published between 1994 and 2013. A flowchart describing the identification process is presented in Fig 1. Study characteristics of included trials are presented in Tables 1 and 2. …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meta-analysis of Parental Protection of Children From Tobacco Smoke Exposure

Rosen¹,

Myers²,

Hovell

et al. 2014

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Worldwide, roughly 40% of children are exposed to the damaging and sometimes deadly effects of tobacco smoke. Interventions aimed at reducing child tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) have shown mixed results. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify effects of interventions aimed at decreasing child TSE.METHODS: Data sources included Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, PsycNet, and Embase. Controlled trials that included parents of young children were selected. Two reviewers extracted TSE data, as assessed by parentally-reported exposure or protection (PREP) and biomarkers. Risk ratios and differences were calculated by using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed.RESULTS: Thirty studies were included. Improvements were observed from baseline to follow-up for parentally-reported and biomarker data in most intervention and control groups. Interventions demonstrated evidence of small benefit to intervention participants at follow-up (PREP: 17 studies, n = 6820, relative risk 1.12, confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 1.18], P , .0001). Seven percent more children were protected in intervention groups relative to control groups. Intervention parents smoked fewer cigarettes around children at follow-up than did control parents (P = .03). Biomarkers (13 studies, n = 2601) at follow-up suggested lower child exposure among intervention participants (RD 20.05, CI 20.13 to 0.03, P = .20).CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to prevent child TSE are moderately beneficial at the individual level. Widespread child TSE suggests potential for significant population impact. More research is needed to improve intervention effectiveness and child TSE measurement. KEY WORDS secondhand smoke exposure, tobacco smoke exposure, metaanalysis, systematic review, child ABBREVIATIONS CCR-cotinine/creatinine ratio CI-confidence interval CT-controlled trial PREP-parentally reported exposure or protection RCT-randomized controlled trial RD-relative difference RR-relative risk SHS-secondhand smoke THS-thirdhand smoke TSE-tobacco smoke exposure Dr Rosen conceptualized and designed the study, oversaw all aspects of the research, performed the systematic review of the literature, extracted data from the original studies, contributed to the statistical analysis, wrote sections of the manuscript, and edited the entire manuscript; Ms Myers contributed to systematically reviewing the literature, extracted data from the original articles, contributed to the data analysis, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; Dr Hovell contributed to the design of the meta-analysis and interpretation of the data and edited the manuscript for scientific content; Dr Zucker assisted with various statistical issues in the analysis of the manuscript and edited the manuscript; Ms Ben Noach contributed to the design of the study, the systematic review of the literature, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the m...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…83 1. PREP at follow-up.Seventeen studies (n = 6820), 20,23,[28][29][30][31][32][83][84][85][86]88,[90][91][92][93][94] were included in the analysis of PREP at follow-up (Fig 2A). Benefit was apparent in 88.2% (15/17) of studies, with 29.4% (5/ 17) showing a statistically significant advantage to the intervention group.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-analysis of Parental Protection of Children From Tobacco Smoke Exposure

Rosen¹,

Myers²,

Hovell

et al. 2014

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Se visualiza que se necesitarán programas intensivos de intervención para lograrlo, 27,28 por lo que recomendamos referir a los pacientes con este hábito a clínicas especializadas en el apoyo para abandonar el tabaquismo. Un estudio en Inglaterra demostró que al lograr la reducción de la exposición al humo de tabaco en escolares mediante un video educativo, se redujeron las hospitalizaciones y las visitas a urgencias.…”

Section: Factores Inespecíficosunclassified

“…Désirée Larenas-Linnemann, 1 Jorge Salas-Hernández, 2 Juan Carlos Vázquez-García, 3 Ignacio Ortiz-Aldana, 4 Margarita Fernández-Vega, 5 Blanca Estela Del Río-Navarro, 6 María del Carmen Cano-Salas, 7 Jorge Agustín Luna-Pech, 8 José Antonio Ortega-Martell, 9 Jade Romero-Lombard, 10 Erika del Carmen López-Estrada, 11 Jimena Villaverde-Rosas, 12 José Luis Mayorga-Butrón, 13 Mario Humberto Vargas-Becerra, 14 Martín BedollaBarajas, 15 Noel Rodríguez-Pérez, 16 Ambrocio Aguilar-Aranda, 17 Carlos Adrián Jiménez-González, 18 Carlos García-Bolaños, 19 Claudia GarridoGalindo, 20 David Alejandro Mendoza-Hernández, 21 Enrique Mendoza-López, 22 Gerardo López-Pérez, 21 Guillermo Hideo Wakida-Kuzonoki, 23 Héctor Hernán Ruiz-Gutiérrez, 24 Héctor León-Molina, 25 Héctor Martínez-De la Lanza, 26 Héctor Stone-Aguilar, 27 Javier Gómez-Vera, 28 Jorge…”

unclassified

Guía Mexicana del Asma: GUIMA 2017

Larenas-Linnemann¹,

Salas-Hernández²,

Vázquez-García³

et al. 2017

RAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo debe citarse como: Larenas-Linnemann D, Salas-Hernández J, Vázquez-García JC, Ortiz-Aldana I, Fernández-Vega M, Del Río-Navarro BE, et al. Guía Mexicana del Asma 2017. Rev Alerg Mex. 2017;64 Supl 1:s11-s128. AbstractBackground: The need for a national guideline, with a broad basis among specialists and primary care physicians was felt in Mexico, to try unifying asthma management. As several high-quality asthma guidelines exist worldwide, it was decided to select the best three for transculturation. Methods: Following the internationally recommended methodology for guideline transculturation, ADAPTE, a literature search for asthma guidelines, published 1-1-2007 through 31-12-2015 was conducted. AGREE-II evaluations yielded 3/40 most suitable for transculturation. Their compound evidence was fused with local reality, patient preference, cost and safety considerations to draft the guideline document. Subsequently, this was adjusted by physicians from 12 national medical societies in several rounds of a Delphi process and 3 face-to-face meetings to reach the final version. Results: Evidence was fused from British Thoracic Society Asthma Guideline 2014, Global Initiative on Asthma 2015, and Guía Española del Manejo del Asma 2015 (2016 updates included). After 3 Delphi-rounds we developed an evidence-based document taking into account patient characteristics, including age, treatment costs and safety and best locally available medication. Conclusion: In cooperation pulmonologists, allergists, ENT physicians, paediatricians and GPs were able to develop an evidence-based document for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of asthma and its exacerbations in Mexico.Keywords: Clinical practice guideline; Asthma; Asthmatic exacerbation; Bronchodilator; Inhaled corticosteroid; Spirometry; Immunotherapy. IntroducciónLa presentación de este documento muestra la importancia del asma en México por su alta prevalencia, pero también por su subdiagnóstico y tratamiento deficiente, que propician un mal control de los pacientes con asma, crisis más frecuentes y sintomatología activa. En consecuencia, el asma tiene un impacto socioeconómico considerable para el paciente y la sociedad en su conjunto, al igual que afecta la calidad de vida del paciente y su familia. En México, el paciente con asma puede recibir atención médica en los ámbitos pú-blico o privado, en los diferentes niveles de salud y por múltiples especialidades. Todas estas particularidades de la situación nacional indican la necesidad de un documento guía actualizado, con base amplia en múltiples gremios médicos, tanto de primer nivel de atención como de especialidad.El objetivo de la GUIMA 2017 es facilitar la reducción de la morbimortalidad por asma en México, no solo al mejorar el conocimiento acerca de esta patología, sino también al ayudar a la parte administrativa del Sector Salud a gestionar la selección y adquisición más precisa de los medicamentos necesarios para su tratamiento a nivel de la salud pública. Para tal fin se ofrecen lineamientos par...

show abstract

“…Previous research efforts have attempted to use feedback on child's cotinine levels as triggers for parental smoking behavior Advance Access publication March 11, 2013 nicotine & tobacco research, volume 15, number 9 (september 2013) 1511-1518 change, with largely disappointing results (Wakefield et al, 2002;Wilson, Farber, Knowles, & Lavori, 2011) excepting modest effects from a study within a population of children with asthma (Wilson et al, 2001). Studies using direct measures of in-home concentrations of ambient nicotine (Emmons et al, 2001) or PM2.5 have shown better success (Wilson, Ritchie, et al, 2013;Wilson, Semple, et al, 2012), suggesting that the specificity of the information regarding smoke exposure from within the home may be more persuasive.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of Secondhand Cigarette Smoke via Nicotine Using Conductive Polymer Films

Liu

Antwi-Boampong

BelBruno

et al. 2013

Nicotine & Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 2006 U.S. Surgeon General's Report found that there is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). Many smokers attempt to protect others from exposure to SHS; however, it is difficult to assess effectiveness of these behavior changes. There is a need for personal monitoring devices that provide real-time SHS exposure data; at present, there is no device that measures ambient nicotine levels in real time. The development of such a sensor is the objective of this research.

show abstract

Effect of Feedback Regarding Urinary Cotinine and Brief Tailored Advice on Home Smoking Restrictions among Low-Income Parents of Children with Asthma: A Controlled Trial

Cited by 72 publications

References 18 publications

Meta-analysis of Parental Protection of Children From Tobacco Smoke Exposure

Meta-analysis of Parental Protection of Children From Tobacco Smoke Exposure

Guía Mexicana del Asma: GUIMA 2017

Detection of Secondhand Cigarette Smoke via Nicotine Using Conductive Polymer Films

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About