1994
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)76967-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Fat and Protein Contents on Droplet Size and Surface Protein Coverage in Dairy Emulsions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As protein load did not change significantly (P > 0.05) between treatments, the fraction of total protein adsorbed at the fatewater interface increased with decreasing protein:fat ratio, as previously reported by Tomas and Paquet (1994). In the current study, between 6.07 and 11.41% of total protein was adsorbed at the fatwater interface in emulsions.…”
Section: Protein Load and Identificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As protein load did not change significantly (P > 0.05) between treatments, the fraction of total protein adsorbed at the fatewater interface increased with decreasing protein:fat ratio, as previously reported by Tomas and Paquet (1994). In the current study, between 6.07 and 11.41% of total protein was adsorbed at the fatwater interface in emulsions.…”
Section: Protein Load and Identificationsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It has been previously shown that, as the protein:fat ratio decreases in oil-in-water systems, the amount of protein available for emulsification decreases, leading to droplet coalescence, a smaller fat surface area and larger fat globules (Floury et al, 2000). However, when aggregated droplets were dissociated using SDS in lowprotein emulsions (protein:fat ratio, w0.25), it was found that the droplet size had increased very little (Tomas & Paquet, 1994).…”
Section: Fat Globule Sizementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Protein surface coverage was calculated using a depletion method adapted from that described by Tomas et al [9]. The surface protein concentration was determined after emulsion separation using the equation shown above.…”
Section: Protein Loading At Emulsion Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skim milk powder, sweet buttermilk (BM) powder, butter-derived serum phase, whey proteins, casein dispersions, phospholipids, and purified milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) suspensions have been successfully used to make emulsions (Tomas and Paquet, 1994;Elling et al, 1996;McCrae et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%