Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Familiarity on the Processing of Human Faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
133
3
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(80 reference statements)
12
133
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of stereotyping, however, the precise functional significance of amygdala activity remains open to debate (Knutson et al, 2007;Cunningham et al, 2004;Phelps et al, 2000). Although activity in this structure has been observed in tasks demanding the overt categorization of male and female faces (e.g., Fischer et al, 2004;Phillips et al, 2001;DuBois et al, 1999), this effect likely reflects an evaluative component of person construal, rather than stereotyping per se. As Knutson et al (2007) have reported, ''further research is needed before stating that performing gender stereotypic tasks activates the amygdala, as amygdala activation to gender stereotyping has not been previously reported in the literature' ' (p. 926).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of stereotyping, however, the precise functional significance of amygdala activity remains open to debate (Knutson et al, 2007;Cunningham et al, 2004;Phelps et al, 2000). Although activity in this structure has been observed in tasks demanding the overt categorization of male and female faces (e.g., Fischer et al, 2004;Phillips et al, 2001;DuBois et al, 1999), this effect likely reflects an evaluative component of person construal, rather than stereotyping per se. As Knutson et al (2007) have reported, ''further research is needed before stating that performing gender stereotypic tasks activates the amygdala, as amygdala activation to gender stereotyping has not been previously reported in the literature' ' (p. 926).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sex of faces, like their identity, is a relatively invariant property. Moreover, whereas the extent to which sex processing and identity processing are independent has been a matter of debate (see Young, 1998, for discussion) and a degree of independence has been convincingly established (Bruce et al, 1987), a variety of recent evidence suggests that the sex and identity of faces are processed through a single route (see, e.g., Calder, Burton, Miller, Young, & Akamatsu, 2001;Dubois et al, 1999;Ganel & Goshen-Gottstein, 2002;Goshen-Gottstein & Ganel, 2000), as Haxby et al's (2000) conception of involvement of a neurological pathway in the analysis of invariant properties of faces would suggest. Thus, our finding of asymmetric Garner interference between sex and emotion classification is consistent with this particular reading of Haxby et al's model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ganel and Goshen-Gottstein (2002) found symmetric Garner interference effects for sex and familiarity judgments, with sex judgments being affected by variations in familiarity, and familiarity judgments being affected by variations in identity. Another result problematic for the parallel systems view is that the FFA has been found to be similarly activated by sex and identity judgments of faces (Dubois et al, 1999).…”
Section: Interaction Between Sex and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%