2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Eu3+ on the Structural, Magnetic and Mössbauer Spectroscopy Studies of Copper Ferrite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, spinel ferrite nanomaterials (SFNs) such as LiFe 2 O 4 [ 9 ], CoFe 2 O 4 [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], NiFe 2 O 4 [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], and CuFe 2 O 4 have been reported as better electrode materials for ASCs because of their superior electrochemical performance. CuFe 2 O 4 (Cu-ferrite) is considered as a better material for energy storage application because of its unique valence shell electronic configuration (3d 10 4s 1 ), higher theoretical capacity (895 mAh/g), and relatively low cost due to the abundance of Cu and Fe [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Its performance can be further enhanced by combining it with carbonaceous material leading to hybrid electrode configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, spinel ferrite nanomaterials (SFNs) such as LiFe 2 O 4 [ 9 ], CoFe 2 O 4 [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], NiFe 2 O 4 [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], and CuFe 2 O 4 have been reported as better electrode materials for ASCs because of their superior electrochemical performance. CuFe 2 O 4 (Cu-ferrite) is considered as a better material for energy storage application because of its unique valence shell electronic configuration (3d 10 4s 1 ), higher theoretical capacity (895 mAh/g), and relatively low cost due to the abundance of Cu and Fe [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Its performance can be further enhanced by combining it with carbonaceous material leading to hybrid electrode configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%