2015
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ethnicity on first trimester biomarkers for combined trisomy 21 screening: results from a multicenter study in six Asian countries

Abstract: The use of a correction factor is recommended based on the differences in European and Asian MoM values. Developing country-specific medians in larger study populations can help identify clinical relevant differences and give the opportunity to explore a more accurate risk calculation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(37 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies have shown that adjustment for differing ethnicities increases the sensitivity of the test [6, 7]. However, this is achieved at the cost of an increased number of false positives which leads to more invasive procedures being conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier studies have shown that adjustment for differing ethnicities increases the sensitivity of the test [6, 7]. However, this is achieved at the cost of an increased number of false positives which leads to more invasive procedures being conducted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a comparable study by Leung et al [6] found that Chinese women have a higher level of both serum markers in the maternal circulation than Caucasian women. To ensure that screening is effective, population-specific models for median levels of PAPP-A, and free β-hCG should be developed to provide more accurate risk calculations [6, 7]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The screening performance of the combined test has been reported to range from 82 to 95% detection rate, with a 5 to 7% false positive (FP) rate. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, it may vary between different ethnicities as well as by age group. [16][17][18] According to the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) proposed screening, patients with a risk lower than 1:1,000 are classified as low risk and are reassured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies demonstrated an association between individual marker levels and rate of FGR, but most studies have only a limited number of women, and it is di cult to implement these ndings in actual use. Moreover, it is well established that racial factors strongly impact on serum marker levels (9)(10)(11)(12)(13) , and the normative data of serum biomarkers derived from Caucasian women cannot accurately be interpreted when used in other parts of the world. Though several studies have linked abnormal serum marker levels to higher rate of FGR, no study provides objective methods or models derived from individual serum markers that can be clinically used to determine the probability of FGR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%