2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2015.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of epitaxial layer thickness on the electrical properties of Ti/n-AlGaAs grown by MBE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thicker epitaxial layer of a similar material showed lower barrier height, which is confirmed by the results [ 21 ]. Some of the Schottky diodes follow the TE mechanism, whereas others do not follow this mechanism because of the patches related to decreased barrier height that is embedded in the interface of the Schottky diodes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The thicker epitaxial layer of a similar material showed lower barrier height, which is confirmed by the results [ 21 ]. Some of the Schottky diodes follow the TE mechanism, whereas others do not follow this mechanism because of the patches related to decreased barrier height that is embedded in the interface of the Schottky diodes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Barrier height inhomogeneity (BHI) causes abnormal electrical behavior in the Schottky barrier [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. When the barrier height fluctuates between low and high regions, it is considered an inhomogeneous barrier height and can be modeled with a Gaussian distribution [ 21 ]. The theoretical values of the Schottky barrier height ( Φ b ) obtained from equation [ 3 ] are shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, in the neutral region (-n), far away from the junction, the current is purely electronic and is determined by the majority drift, resulting from the presence of a very weak internal electric field. This rationale is attributed to Shockley, who provided experimental proof along with Hynes in 1951 [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%