2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of electrode geometry on the electrolyte resistance measurement over the surface of a skin phantom in a noninvasive manner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described in the previous section, we suppose that this difference in reproducibility of the calibration curve stems from the current distribution and surface condition of the electrode. The uniform current distribution on the well-ordered surface of the PPE provides constant calibration curves, whereas the highly concentrated current on the disordered edge corner of the IDE can cause unstable profiles . The results clearly demonstrate that the PPE is more favorable in sensor applications than the IDE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As described in the previous section, we suppose that this difference in reproducibility of the calibration curve stems from the current distribution and surface condition of the electrode. The uniform current distribution on the well-ordered surface of the PPE provides constant calibration curves, whereas the highly concentrated current on the disordered edge corner of the IDE can cause unstable profiles . The results clearly demonstrate that the PPE is more favorable in sensor applications than the IDE.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The uniform current distribution on the well-ordered surface of the PPE provides constant calibration curves, whereas the highly concentrated current on the disordered edge corner of the IDE can cause unstable profiles. 39 The results clearly demonstrate that the PPE is more favorable in sensor applications than the IDE. Selectivity of the IgG Sensor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%