2003
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/83.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Chronic Leg Ulcer Size and Appearance

Abstract: Background and Purpose. Electrical current has been recommended for use on chronic pressure ulcers; however, the ability of this modality to improve healing of other types of chronic ulcers is less well established. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of high-voltage pulsed current (HVPC) on healing of chronic leg ulcers. Subjects. Twenty-seven people with 42 chronic leg ulcers participated in the study. Methods. The subjects were separated into subgroups according to primary etiology of the wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
96
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A further 12 studies were found on reference review [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Full articles of the remaining 45 studies were collected and evaluated 21 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis [9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] ( Table 2). The reasons for excluding the 23 studies were a nonrandomised design [10][11][12]16,17,[20][21][22][23]44,53,54,56,57], different outcome measures such as limb salvage or oedema reduction [13,14,19,[50][51]…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A further 12 studies were found on reference review [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. Full articles of the remaining 45 studies were collected and evaluated 21 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis [9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] ( Table 2). The reasons for excluding the 23 studies were a nonrandomised design [10][11][12]16,17,[20][21][22][23]44,53,54,56,57], different outcome measures such as limb salvage or oedema reduction [13,14,19,[50][51]…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis included 21 trials [9,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] and 866 patients of whom 34 were randomised in one parallel nonplacebo singleblind trial [38], 50 were randomised in one parallel nonplacebo double-blind trial [40], 138 were randomised in three parallel nonplacebo open trials [31,34,35], eight were randomised in one parallel-placebo single-blind trial [33], 246 were randomised in six parallel-placebo double-blind trials [28][29][30]32,37,39] and 390 were randomised in nine parallel-placebo open trials [9,24-27, 36,41-43]. The mean age of patients ranged from 29Á25 [32] to 83Á0 [36] years.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Patients and Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations