2015
DOI: 10.5958/0973-9718.2015.00027.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of egg yolk levels and equilibration periods on freezability of Jamunapari buck semen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean post-thaw motility (PTM) and acrosomal integrity was significantly (p<0.01) higher in Group II. The result of PTM of both groups was almost similar to the findings of Tharasanit and Techakumphu [11] in Black Bengal goat but the PTM of semen in Group II bucks was lower than those reported in semi-intensively managed Jamunpari bucks [12]. Although it was higher in Group I than reported by Daskin et al [13] in intensively managed Angora bucks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The mean post-thaw motility (PTM) and acrosomal integrity was significantly (p<0.01) higher in Group II. The result of PTM of both groups was almost similar to the findings of Tharasanit and Techakumphu [11] in Black Bengal goat but the PTM of semen in Group II bucks was lower than those reported in semi-intensively managed Jamunpari bucks [12]. Although it was higher in Group I than reported by Daskin et al [13] in intensively managed Angora bucks.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Average post thaw viability observed in present study (Table 2) was higher than observations in Boer bucks (27.33±0.85), Yodmingkwan et al, (2016); Jamunapari bucks (41.01±3.02), Ramachandran et al, (2015); Gaddi bucks (45.26±1.32), Sharma, (2018) and less than Black Bengal bucks (50.48±0.65), Singh et al,(2016); Jakhrana bucks (53.4±0.80), Priyadharshini et al, (2011); Alpine Sannen and Beetal crosses (55.25-65.75%), Narwade et al, (2017); Chegu bucks (65.20±1.53), Thakur et al, (2005b). Similarly, HOST reactive sperms in present study (Table 2) were higher than observations in Boer bucks (8.04±1.02), Yodmingkwan et al, (2016); Jamunapari bucks (41.01± 3.02), Ramachandran et al, (2015); lower than Black Bengal bucks (47.02±0.58), Singh et al, (2016), Jakhrana bucks (46.45-47.31%), Kumar et al (2016); Jamunapari bucks (51.83±1.9), Ranjan et al,(2015); Gaddi bucks (52.48±1.43), Sharma, (2018) and Alpine Sannen and Beetal crosses (61.0-64.63%), Narwade et al, (2017), respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Both these interactions stimulate cryocapacitation, acrosomal damage, loss of motility and viability of sperm (Upreti et al 1999). Therefore, to reduce these interactive losses, protocols that include sperm washing (Roca et al 1997) and use of low or high egg yolk concentration (Bispo et al 2011;Naing et al 2011;Ranjan et al 2015) with variable sperm count have been proposed. Sperm washing removes the protective proteins and antioxidative enzymes while the concentration of egg yolk affects the cryoprotective capacity of the extender (Ferreiral et al 2014), indicating a cumulative effect of different extrinsic and intrinsic factors in regulating the semen quality at different steps during cryopreservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%