2015
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1033137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of drilling mud addition on activated sludge and processes in sequencing batch reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially important, since the activatedsludge organisms do not function in an environment with the parameters of raw wastewater. This aspect has been discussed in detail in previous work (Babko et al, 2016(Babko et al, , 2017. Second, the technological efficiency omits the actual amounts of pollutants removed during the treatment; hence, the same efficiency may correspond to varying amounts of pollutants removed during the treatment.…”
Section: Influence Of Drilling Fluid On Treated Sewage Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is especially important, since the activatedsludge organisms do not function in an environment with the parameters of raw wastewater. This aspect has been discussed in detail in previous work (Babko et al, 2016(Babko et al, , 2017. Second, the technological efficiency omits the actual amounts of pollutants removed during the treatment; hence, the same efficiency may correspond to varying amounts of pollutants removed during the treatment.…”
Section: Influence Of Drilling Fluid On Treated Sewage Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The heterogeneous composition of drilling waste requires the use of many different management methods, from physical and chemical methods to biological treatment (Cuttings Treatment Technology Evaluation, 2009;Ball et al, 2012;Onwukwe and Nwakaudu, 2012). Yang et al (2013) and Babko et al (2016Babko et al ( , 2017 found that significant removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in water-based fluids can be achieved in laboratory sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) with activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). However, considering the negative biological effects of offshore discharge of drilling waste on marine filter-feeding organisms (Barlow and Kingston, 2001), it may be supposed that the cotreatment of DF with municipal wastewater may cause adverse changes in the ecological structure of the activated sludge, in which filter feeders are the most important group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the anoxic volume is kept unchanged, the nitrate concentration will increase in the effluent, potentially causing problematic issues in the sedimentation tank (floating sludge), demanding additional method of sludge treatment or usage of membranes [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The A/O system is characterized by the same configuration as in the case of the Phoredox, Bardenpho system; however, the anaerobic zone is compartmentalized, inducing a plug-flow regime that improves the removal capacity of phosphorus as well as facilitates converting the easily biodegradable material to acetate [11][12][13][14][15][16]. While comparing the existing schemes of biological phosphate removal or recovery from wastewater presented in literature, it is necessary to distinguish their advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also allows adjusting the length and order of individual phases [14][15][16][17][18][19]. The basic operation phases in SBRs are as follows: filling, mixing, aeration, settling, decantation, idling [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%