1994
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.40.5_j35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Donor Embryo Stage on Development of Nuclear Transplants in Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utilization of Ca 2+ -free solution for cell disaggregation has also been reported for the purpose of weakening intercellular adhesion [ 95 , 96 , 97 ]. In the embryo nuclear transfer procedure, trypsin solution is used to prepare donor cells from cleavage-stage embryos [ 98 , 99 ]. However, the differences in the effectiveness of these media for blastomere separation and the subsequent effects on embryo development have not yet been clarified.…”
Section: Establishment Of Efficient Production System For Monozygoticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of Ca 2+ -free solution for cell disaggregation has also been reported for the purpose of weakening intercellular adhesion [ 95 , 96 , 97 ]. In the embryo nuclear transfer procedure, trypsin solution is used to prepare donor cells from cleavage-stage embryos [ 98 , 99 ]. However, the differences in the effectiveness of these media for blastomere separation and the subsequent effects on embryo development have not yet been clarified.…”
Section: Establishment Of Efficient Production System For Monozygoticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important factor influencing the developmental ability of nuclear transferred eggs is the combination of the cell cycle of the donor nucleus and recipient cytoplasm [18]. Aono et al [19] reported that the developmental ability of nuclear transferred bovine oocytes to blastocysts receiving a blastomere from in vitro fertilized embryos cultured for 116 h was significantly higher than that from embryos cultured for 68, 92 or 140 h. They suggested that such a difference occurred because the cell cycle of the donor nucleus was at a different stage. In the present study, the donor nucleus (blastomere) was fused with enucleated oocytes which were previously parthenogenetically activated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of activated oocytes reduced the frequency of abnormal karyomorphism of NT embryos (1/46 vs. 17/56, P<0.01), and the productivity of NT embryos was further increased by (1) the use of a mix activation method for parthenogenetic activation of un-aged oocytes [35] and (2) synchronizing the cell cycle between donor nuclei and an activated recipient ooplasm [36]. The improvements enabled by these developed techniques subsequently allowed the production of approximately six cloned embryos from a single donor embryo [37].…”
Section: Application Of the Developmental Engineering Utilizing The Tmentioning
confidence: 99%