2003
DOI: 10.1094/php-2003-0325-01-rv
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Diseases on Soybean Yields in the United States and Ontario (1999 to 2002)

Abstract: Soybean yields in the U.S. and Ontario have often been suppressed by diseases. The resulting losses are important to rural economies and to the economies of allied industries in urban areas. The authors compiled estimates of soybean yield losses due to diseases for each soybean producing state in the U.S. and Ontario from 1999 to 2002. The goal was to provide this information to help funding agencies and scientists prioritize research objectives and budgets. Accepted for publication 4 March 2003. Published 25… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
78
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Working with southern stem canker, Rupe et al (1999) completed two field trials in which disease progression occurred most rapidly when soybeans were inoculated at growth stage V 6 and slowest at growth stage V 1 . In our experiments, V 1 is slightly younger than seedlings in our study that were inoculated at 2 wk after planting Smith and Backman (1989) found in field studies that the highest disease severity at R6 resulted when soybeans were inoculated For personal use only.…”
contrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Working with southern stem canker, Rupe et al (1999) completed two field trials in which disease progression occurred most rapidly when soybeans were inoculated at growth stage V 6 and slowest at growth stage V 1 . In our experiments, V 1 is slightly younger than seedlings in our study that were inoculated at 2 wk after planting Smith and Backman (1989) found in field studies that the highest disease severity at R6 resulted when soybeans were inoculated For personal use only.…”
contrasting
confidence: 43%
“…With the decline in production of susceptible varieties and implementation of good management practices the incidence of stem canker has decreased. However, from 1999 to 2002 stem canker was considered an important soybean disease in Ontario with estimated yield losses of up to 7000 t in 1999 (Wrather et al 2003). Recently, in Ontario, stem canker was observed on soybean seedlings and plants prior to flowering that were growing through soybean debris from the previous year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimated yield losses was 3.3 million tons in 2009 in 28 U.S. states (Wrather and Koenning 2010). RKN often occurs in soybean fields, but to a lesser extent than SCN (Wrather et al 2003) with losses estimated at 1.9 million tons over 28 U.S. states in 2009 (Wrather and Koenning 2010). If RKN interacts with other disease pathogens, damage is greater than would occur with RKN alone (Goswami and Agrawal 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines Ichinohe -SCN) is the pathogen that causes more damages to soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] throughout the world (Wrather et al, 2003). The most secure and economical control of SCN is the use of resistant cultivars associated to the rotation of non-host crops (Embrapa, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%