2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0103-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of digital elevation model on Mohr-Coulomb geophysical flow model output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, through our numerical experiment results, we support the work of Capra et al (2011) and Stefanescu et al (2012) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In addition, through our numerical experiment results, we support the work of Capra et al (2011) and Stefanescu et al (2012) …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…DEM resolution can have a strong impact on the TITAN2D outputs as has been demonstrated in recent works (e.g., Capra et al, ; Stefanescu, Bursik, Cordoba, et al, ; Stefanescu, Bursik, & Patra, ). We use a DEM with 10 m of horizontal resolution and an associated altimetric error of about ±3.5 m (Tarquini et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Some sources of DEMs can be found in Table 1. The effect of DEM interpolation and sampling schemes on model outputs is discussed in Stefanescu et al (2009); (2) Defining dimensions of an initial ''pile'' of material or a flux source which adds mass over a specified time period and area at a specified rate, both including shape, footprint, height, volume, position and initial velocity (if required); (3) A variable that represents the angle of internal friction of the granular pile, which must be higher than the chosen bed friction angle. Analysis of input sensitivity and experience has shown that flows are relatively insensitive to the internal friction angle (Dalbey & Patra, 2008); (4) A variable that represents the angle of bed friction between the granular pile and the substrate.…”
Section: User Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of these models have been used for block-andash flows at several volcanoes including Colima, El Chichon and Nevado de Toluca volcanoes in Mexico Patra et al, 2005;Saucedo et al, 2005;Rupp et al, 2006;Macias et al, 2008;Sulpizio et al, 2010); Mount Taranaki, New Zealand (Procter et al, 2010); Tungurahua, Ecuador (Kelfoun et al, 2009); Galeras and El Chichon Volcano, Columbia (Stefanescu et al, 2009;Murcia et al, 2010); Arenal Volcano, Costa Rica (Berrocal & Malavassi, 2006); Soufrière Hills Volcano, Montserrat (Hidayat et al, 2007;Ogburn, 2008;Ogburn et al, in press); and Merapi Volcano, Indonesia (Itoh, 2000;Charbonnier & Gertisser, 2009, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%