Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Porcelain‐Resin Bond Strength

Yavuz, Taner; Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf; Dilber, Erhan; Tobi, Elif Sumeyye; Kılıç, Hamdi Şükür

doi:10.1111/jopr.12387

Cited by 30 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another study also corroborated these finding and noted that conditioning the PEEK surface with MMA‐containing adhesive systems after silica coating or sandblasting increased the SBS values . Stawarczyk et al noted that Visio.link acted as the positive control group, because all previous studies showed very high bonding properties after the use of Visio.link as conditioner on different pretreated PEEK surfaces, and recommended sandblasting as one of the best initial pretreatment options for PEEK surfaces . Thus, the current findings are not surprising.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…Laser energy was applied to the surface with a noncontact handpiece (H02‐N, 0.9 mm spot size), and the laser beam was aligned perpendicular to the specimen surface at a distance of 10 mm. The entire surface of the specimen was scanned manually with the laser beam while being cooled with water and air . After pretreatments, all specimens were cleaned with the distilled water in an ultrasonic cleaner for 60 seconds and dried with oil‐free air.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The entire surface of the specimen was scanned manually with the laser beam while being cooled with water and air. 21 After pretreatments, all specimens were cleaned with the distilled water in an ultrasonic cleaner for 60 seconds and dried with oil-free air.…”

Section: Surface Pretreatmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Rosentritt et al reported that tribochemical treatment might be an alternative pretreatment on PEEK surfaces to achieve successful bonding; however, to our knowledge, there are relatively few reports on material processing and no reports on PEEK surface treatment with lasers. Er:YAG laser is a commonly used laser system for surface treatment of dental materials . However, there is no consensus in the literature about the laser parameters for optimal bond strength of resin‐based materials.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Er:YAG laser is a commonly used laser system for surface treatment of dental materials. [19][20][21] However, there is no consensus in the literature about the laser parameters for optimal bond strength of resin-based materials.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone

Çağlar

Ateş

Duymuş

2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Surface Pretreatmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone

Çağlar

Ateş

Duymuş

2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments

Bayraktar

Arslan

Demirtag

2020

Microscopy Res & Technique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study intended to compare the repair bond strength of computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) blocks consisting of resin and feldspathic ceramics following different surface treatments using the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test. Ten specimens were prepared with 4 mm height for Vita Enamic (VE), Lava Ultimate (LU), Vita Mark II (VM), and thermocycled (10,000 cycle, 5-55 C). Each material was categorized into one of five subgroups according to following surface treatments: (a) bur grinding (BG), (b) hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), (c) neodymiumdoped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG or NY), (d) erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG or EY), and (e) erbium, chromium-doped yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG or ECY) laser conditioning. After surface treatment procedures, specimens were properly restored to 4 mm high with a micro-hybrid composite resin. Bar specimens (1 × 1 × 8 mm) were obtained using a low-speed cutting machine and then thermocycled (10,000 cycle, 5-55 C). The μTBS was tested at 1 mm/min crosshead speed, and failure modes were evaluated. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. LU-BG showed significantly higher μTBS (32.94 ± 5.80 MPa) compared to LU-laser groups (p < .05). VE-BG showed significantly higher μTBS (22.06 ± 4.26 MPa) compared to other VE groups (p < .05). Among the laser groups, the NY laser produced the lowest (p < .05) μTBS for LU (13.42 ± 3.44 MPa) and VE (2.27 ± 0.85 MPa), while EY showed the highest (p < .05).Laser-treated VM groups were all prefailured. VM-HF produced a higher μTBS (18.73 ± 3.75 MPa) than VM-BG (5.05 ± 1.76 MPa) (p < .05).

show abstract

Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To evaluate clinical performance of the new CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics and compare it with ceramic partial coverage restorations. Materials and methods An electronic search of 3 databases (The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE/PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted. English clinical studies published between 2005 and September 2020 that evaluated the clinical performance of CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics inlays, onlays, or overlays were selected. The primary clinical question was applied according to PICOS strategy (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Study design). The included studies were individually evaluated for risk of bias according to the modified Cochrane Collaboration tool criteria. Results A total of 7 studies were included according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the included studies, 6 were randomized clinical trials while one study was longitudinal observational study without control group. According to the results of the included studies, the success rate of CAD/CAM resin-based composite ranged from 85.7 to 100% whereas the success rate reported for ceramic partial coverage restorations ranged from 93.3 to 100%. Fractures and debondings are found to be the most common cause of restorations failure. Conclusion CAD/CAM resin-based composite can be considered a reliable material for partial coverage restorations with clinical performance similar to glass ceramic restorations. However, this result needs to be confirmed in long-term evaluations. Clinical relevance CAD/CAM resin-based composites provide a potential alternative to ceramic indirect restorations. However, clinicians must be aware of the lake of knowledge regarding long-term outcome.

show abstract

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Porcelain‐Resin Bond Strength

Abstract: Silanization after coating with silica improves the bond strengths of both EX and ICZ specimens, while HF etching is favorable only for the EX specimens.

Cited by 30 publications

References 37 publications

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone

An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Various Adhesives and Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Polyetheretherketone

Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin‐ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments

Clinical performance of resin-matrix ceramic partial coverage restorations: a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About